| Literature DB >> 23331548 |
Etsuko Kurimoto1, Nobuaki Miyahara, Arihiko Kanehiro, Koichi Waseda, Akihiko Taniguchi, Genyo Ikeda, Hikari Koga, Hisakazu Nishimori, Yasushi Tanimoto, Mikio Kataoka, Yoichiro Iwakura, Erwin W Gelfand, Mitsune Tanimoto.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary emphysema is characterized by alveolar destruction and persistent inflammation of the airways. Although IL-17A contributes to many chronic inflammatory diseases, it's role in the inflammatory response of elastase-induced emphysema remains unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23331548 PMCID: PMC3564829 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Static lung compliance (Cst) values on day 21 after intratrachial instillation of porcine pancreas elastase (PPE) or saline. The results are expressed as means ± SEM (n=12 in each group). *p<0.01 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline. **p<0.05 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline. #p<0.01 versus WT PPE.
Figure 2Morphometric assessment performed on day 21 after instillation of PPE or saline. Representative photographs of lungs of WT mice treated with saline (A), IL-17A−/− mice treated with saline (B), WT mice treated with PPE (C), and IL-17A−/− mice treated with PPE (D) groups. (E) Mean linear intercepts (Lm) values of alveoli. Lm values were obtained as described in Methods. Bar = 200 μm. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=12 in each group). *p<0.01 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline. #p<0.05 versus WT PPE.
Figure 3Cellular composition in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid after intratracheal instillation of PPE or saline. BAL fluid was obtained as described in Methods. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=12 in each group). (A) Cellular composition in BAL fluid on day 4 after intratracheal instillation of PPE or saline. *p<0.01 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline. #p<0.05 versus WT PPE. ##p<0.01 versus WT PPE. (B) Cellular composition in BAL fluid on day 21 after intratracheal instillation of PPE or saline. *p<0.05 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline.
Figure 4Cytokine and chemokine levels in the BAL fluid and lung homogenates. (A) KC, MIP-2, and IL-1β levels in BAL fluid. BAL fluid was obtained from the same groups as described in Figure 3A. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=12 in each group). *p<0.01 compared to WT saline and IL-17A−/− saline. #p<0.05 versus WT PPE. ##p<0.01 versus WT PPE. (B) IL-17A levels in lung homogenates on day 4 after intratracheal instillation of PPE or saline. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=8 in each group). (C) IL-17A levels in lung homogenates on day 21 after intratracheal instillation of PPE or saline. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=8 in each group).
Figure 5IL-17A levels in the lung. IL-17A levels in lung homogenates of WT mice after intratracheal instillation of PPE were measured by ELISA as described in Methods. The results for each group are expressed as means ± SEM (n=8 in each group). *p <0.01, day 0 and day 0.5 versus day 1 and day 2.
Figure 6Intracellular detection of IL-17A and IFN-γ in lung CD4+ T cells from WT mice 2 days after elastase administration. (A) Percentages of IL-17A+ and IFN-γ+ T cells following saline treatment (Saline group) or PPE treatment (PPE group). Intracellular IL-17A and IFN-γ were assessed as described in Methods. The data shown are representative of two independent experiments. (B) The numbers of IL-17A+ and IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells in the lung of WT mice. The numbers of IL-17A+ CD4 T cells and IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells were calculated as described in Methods. Groups are the same as in (A). Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=6 in each group). *p<0.05 versus saline-treated group.