Literature DB >> 2333128

Intracranial meningiomas. Comparison of plain and contrast-enhanced examinations in CT and MRI.

W Schörner1, P Schubeus, H Henkes, C Rottacker, B Hamm, R Felix.   

Abstract

Fifty patients with intracranial meningiomas underwent plain and contrast-enhanced examinations with CT and MRI. Each of the MR studies consisted of three plain (T1, proton density and T2-weighted) and a post-contrast series (0.1 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg body weight). All techniques (plain CT, plain MRI, contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced MRI) proved to be highly efficient as regards tumour detection: depending on the technique, an intracranial lesion was demonstrated in 47-50 cases. The image contrast was assessed as good or excellent in 21 cases having plain CT and in 33 cases having plain MRI, but in 46 and 50 of the contrast-enhanced CT and MRI studies respectively. Adequate tumour delineation was achieved in 18 cases with plain CT, in 35 cases with plain MRI and in 46 and 50 cases of the contrast-enhanced CT and MRI examinations. The contrast-enhanced studies proved to be superior to the plain CT and MRI studies as regards image contrast and tumor delineation. Because of the methodological advantages of the MRI technique, contrast-enhanced MRI was judged to be slightly superior to contrast-enhanced CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2333128     DOI: 10.1007/bf00593935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  15 in total

1.  [Tissue characterization with T1, T2 and proton density: dream and reality].

Authors:  H P Higer; G Bielke
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1986-05

Review 2.  MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  M Brant-Zawadzki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A blinded clinical comparison of MR imaging and CT in neuroradiology.

Authors:  V M Haughton; A A Rimm; K A Sobocinski; R A Papke; D L Daniels; A L Williams; R Lynch; R Levine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas.

Authors:  R D Zimmerman; C A Fleming; L A Saint-Louis; B C Lee; J J Manning; M D Deck
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Blood-brain barrier: phenomenon of increasing importance to the imaging clinician.

Authors:  M R Sage
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Intracranial meningiomas: high-field MR imaging.

Authors:  M V Spagnoli; H I Goldberg; R I Grossman; L T Bilaniuk; J M Gomori; D B Hackney; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR imaging of meningiomas including studies with and without gadolinium-DTPA.

Authors:  G M Bydder; D P Kingsley; J Brown; H P Niendorf; I R Young
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors: measurement of T1. Work in progress.

Authors:  T Araki; T Inouye; H Suzuki; T Machida; M Iio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Dyke Award. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in a brain-abscess model.

Authors:  V M Runge; J A Clanton; A C Price; W A Herzer; J H Allen; C L Partain; A E James
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Acoustic neuromas: Gd-DTPA enhancement in MR imaging.

Authors:  W L Curati; M Graif; D P Kingsley; H P Niendorf; I R Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cystic lumbar meningioma presenting as a ring enhancing lesion on MRI.

Authors:  E W Chynn; K Y Chynn; G V DiGiacinto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Incidental detection of late subsequent intracranial neoplasms with magnetic resonance imaging among adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Noah D Sabin; Aimee K Santucci; Paul Klimo; Melissa M Hudson; Deokumar Srivastava; Nan Zhang; Larry E Kun; Matthew J Krasin; Ching-Hon Pui; Zoltan Patay; Wilburn E Reddick; Robert J Ogg; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Meningioma of the third ventricle. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  V de la Sayette; F Rivaton; F Chapon; P Hubert; F Ganem; J P Houtteville
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Body mass index and the risk of meningioma, glioma and schwannoma in a large prospective cohort study (The HUNT Study).

Authors:  M Wiedmann; C Brunborg; K Lindemann; T B Johannesen; L Vatten; E Helseth; J A Zwart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical experience with an open low-field-strength scanner in a resource challenged African state.

Authors:  Gi Ogbole; Ao Adeleye; Ao Adeyinka; Oa Ogunseyinde
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2012-05

6.  Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Are Equivalent in Mensuration and Similarly Inaccurate in Grade and Type Predictability of Canine Intracranial Gliomas.

Authors:  Krystina L Stadler; Jeffrey D Ruth; Theresa E Pancotto; Stephen R Werre; John H Rossmeisl
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.