Literature DB >> 23331270

An objective assessment of children's physical activity during the Keep It Moving! after-school program.

John M Schuna1, Rebekah L Lauersdorf, Timothy K Behrens, Gary Liguori, Mina L Liebert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After-school programs may provide valuable opportunities for children to accumulate healthful physical activity (PA). This study assessed the PA of third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade children in the Keep It Moving! (KIM) after-school PA program, which was implemented in an ethnically diverse and low socioeconomic status school district in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
METHODS: The PA of KIM participating children (N = 116) at 4 elementary schools was objectively assessed using ActiGraph accelerometers and the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Linear mixed-effects models or generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to compare time spent in sedentary (SED) behaviors, light PA (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), vigorous PA (VPA), and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) between genders and weight status classifications during KIM sessions.
RESULTS: Children accumulated 7.6 minutes of SED time, 26.9 minutes of LPA, and 22.2 minutes of MVPA during KIM sessions. Boys accumulated less SED time (p < .05) and LPA (p = .04) than girls, but accumulated more MPA (p = .04), VPA (p = .03), and MVPA (p = .03). Overweight/obese children accumulated more LPA (p = .04) and less VPA (p < .05) than nonoverweight children. SOFIT data indicated that children spent a considerable proportion of KIM sessions being very active (12.4%), walking (36.0%), or standing (40.3%).
CONCLUSION: The KIM program provides opportunities for disadvantaged children to accumulate substantial amounts of MVPA (>20 minutes per session) in an effort to meet current PA guidelines.
© 2013, American School Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23331270     DOI: 10.1111/josh.12005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  5 in total

1.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children.

Authors:  Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-23

2.  Does participation in physical education reduce sedentary behaviour in school and throughout the day among normal-weight and overweight-to-obese Czech children aged 9-11 years?

Authors:  Erik Sigmund; Dagmar Sigmundová; Zdenek Hamrik; Andrea Madarásová Gecková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A Method for Evaluating Physical Activity Programs in Schools.

Authors:  Cheryl Kelly; Dick Carpenter; Elizabeth Tucker; Carmen Luna; John Donovan; Timothy K Behrens
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  The association of school-related active travel and active after-school clubs with children's physical activity: a cross-sectional study in 11-year-old UK children.

Authors:  Ruth Salway; Lydia Emm-Collison; Simon J Sebire; Janice L Thompson; Deborah A Lawlor; Russell Jago
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael M Tassitano; R Glenn Weaver; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.457

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.