| Literature DB >> 23329944 |
Mohammad Reza Mohammadi1, Pouya Zhand, Behnoush Mortazavi Moghadam, Mohammad Jafar Golalipour.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Morphometric measurements of the corpus callosum (CC) are important to have normative values according to sex, age and race/ethnicity.Entities:
Keywords: Brain; Corpus Callosum; Iran; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sex
Year: 2011 PMID: 23329944 PMCID: PMC3522367 DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.4495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Radiol ISSN: 1735-1065 Impact factor: 0.212
Figure 1Brain MRI demonstrating the measured dimensions.
A, Frontal pole of the brain; B, Occipital pole of the brain; E, Geno of the corpus callosum; Z, Splenium of the corpus callosum
Spearman’s Rho Correlation Coefficient Between the Corpus Callosum Diameters (n = 100)
| AB | 0.449 | 0.713 | 0.448 | 0.122 | 0.560 |
| AE | - | 0.314 | 0.428 | -0.160 | -0.252 |
| BZ | - | - | 0.403 | 0.081 | 0.034 |
| CD | - | - | - | 0.235 | 0.041 |
| FG | - | - | - | - | 0.236 |
a AB, Longitudinal dimension of the brain from the frontal to the occipital pole; AE, From the frontal pole of the brain to the genu of CC; BZ, From the occipital pole of the brain to the splenium of CC; CD, From the superior to the inferior surface of the brain, including the cerebellum; EZ, Length of CC from anterior most point of CC to its posterior most point; FG, Considered as the width of CC in the vertical view of the brain hemispheres.
b P < 0.05
c P < 0.01
Multivariant Linear Regression Between EZ and AB, AE and FG
| Constant | 1.766 | 0.667 | - | 2.647 | 0.009 |
| AB | 0.536 | 0.045 | 0.835 | 11.780 | < 0.0001 |
| AE | -0.943 | 0.108 | -0.622 | -8.717 | < 0.0001 |
| FG | 0.237 | 0.439 | 0.035 | 0.539 | 0.591 |
a AB, Longitudinal dimension of the brain from the frontal to the occipital pole; AE, From the frontal pole of the brain to the genu of CC; FG, Considered as the width of CC in the vertical view of the brain hemispheres.
Dimensions of Corpus Callosum in the Iranian Population According to Gender
| AB | 15.83 ± 0.10 | 16.46 ± 0.11 | 4.21 | < 0.0001 |
| EZ | 7.03 ± 0.07 | 7.10 ± 0.07 | 0.62 | 0.535 |
| AE | 3.60 ± 0.04 | 3.77 ± 0.05 | 2.57 | 0.012 |
| BZ | 5.40 ± 0.06 | 5.81 ± 0.08 | 4.07 | < 0.0001 |
| EZ/3 | 2.34 ± 0.02 | 2.36 ± 0.02 | 0.64 | 0.523 |
| EZ/5 | 1.40 ± 0.01 | 1.41 ± 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.540 |
| CD | 10.47 ± 0.06 | 10.82 ± 0.08 | 3.60 | 0.001 |
| FG | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 1.55 | 0.123 |
a These are explained in the (first footnote) of Table 1
b EZ/3, Longitudinal dimension of the genu
c EZ/5, The posterior fifth
d Abbreviation: SEM, standard error of mean
Dimensions of Corpus Callosum in the Iranian Population According to Age
| AB | 16.13 ± 0.14 | 16.05 ± 0.13 | 16.18 ± 0.13 | 0.2 | 0.795 |
| EZ | 6.82 ± 0.10 | 7.19 ± 0.06 | 7.25 ± 0.08 | 8.1 | 0.001 |
| AE | 3.88 ± 0.05 | 3.59 ± 0.05 | 3.51 ± 0.06 | 13.7 | < 0.0001 |
| BZ | 5.65 ± 0.09 | 5.51 ± 0.10 | 5.61 ± 0.09 | 0.7 | 0.512 |
| EZ/3 | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 2.39 ± 2.02 | 2.41 ± 0.03 | 8.3 | < 0.0001 |
| EZ/5 | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.43 ± 0.01 | 1.45 ± 0.02 | 8.1 | 0.001 |
| CD | 10.82 ± 0.08 | 10.64 ± 0.07 | 10.33 ± 0.09 | 8.3 | < 0.0001 |
| FG | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 4.2 | 0.018 |
a These are explained in the (first footnote) of Table 3
b Abbreviation: SEM, standard error of mean
Figure 2The graph shows dimensions of EZ of the corpus callosum according to gender and age groups.