Literature DB >> 23329670

Dependability of pachymetry measurements after myopic advanced surface ablation using scanning-slit topography and specular microscopy.

Alberto López-Miguel1, Loreto Martínez-Almeida, María Eugenia Mateo, María Begoña Coco-Martín, Jorge L Alió, Miguel J Maldonado.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability, intersession and interobserver reproducibility, and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by scanning-slit topography (SST) and noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM) after advanced surface ablation (ASA).
METHODS: To analyze repeatability, one examiner measured 63 post-myopic ASA eyes five times successively using both techniques randomly. To calculate interobserver reproducibility a second examiner obtained another CCT measurement in a random fashion. To study intersession reproducibility, the first operator obtained CCT measurements from another 24 eyes during two sessions 1 week apart.
RESULTS: With regard to intrasession repeatability, SST and NCSM within-subject standard deviation (S(w)) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were 7.35 and 3.81 μm, and 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. For interobserver reproducibility, SST measurement variability showed correlation with CCT magnitude (r(s) = -0.38; P = 0.002), whereas NCSM did not. NCSM S(w) and ICC were 3.83 μm and 0.99, respectively. For intersession reproducibility, no difference in CCT measurements was found for any technique; S(w) and ICC estimates for SST and NCSM were 12.2 and 8.37 μm, and 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. We found a tendency for the difference (mean SST-NCSM = 13.39 μm) to increase in thicker corneas (r(s) = 0.45, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both noncontact pachymetry techniques provided highly repeatable and quite reproducible CCT measurements in post-ASA patients having no clinically significant corneal haze, except for SST interobserver reproducibility, which decreased in thinner corneas. However, the techniques were not interchangeable. The estimates provided should help clinicians differentiate real CCT change from noncontact pachymetry measurement variability after ASA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329670     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  3 in total

1.  Letter to the editor. "Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery".

Authors:  Alberto López-Miguel; María Sanchidrián; Itziar Fernández; Alfredo Holgueras; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Alberto López-Miguel; María Sanchidrián; Itziar Fernández; Alfredo Holgueras; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation.

Authors:  Eva M Sobas; Sebastián Videla; Amanda Vázquez; Itziar Fernández; Miguel J Maldonado; José-Carlos Pastor
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.