Literature DB >> 23329543

An evaluation of the THIN database in the OMOP Common Data Model for active drug safety surveillance.

Xiaofeng Zhou1, Sundaresan Murugesan, Harshvinder Bhullar, Qing Liu, Bing Cai, Chuck Wentworth, Andrew Bate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been increased interest in using multiple observational databases to understand the safety profile of medical products during the postmarketing period. However, it is challenging to perform analyses across these heterogeneous data sources. The Observational Medical Outcome Partnership (OMOP) provides a Common Data Model (CDM) for organizing and standardizing databases. OMOP's work with the CDM has primarily focused on US databases. As a participant in the OMOP Extended Consortium, we implemented the OMOP CDM on the UK Electronic Healthcare Record database-The Health Improvement Network (THIN).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the implementation of the THIN database in the OMOP CDM and explore its use for active drug safety surveillance.
METHODS: Following the OMOP CDM specification, the raw THIN database was mapped into a CDM THIN database. Ten Drugs of Interest (DOI) and nine Health Outcomes of Interest (HOI), defined and focused by the OMOP, were created using the CDM THIN database. Quantitative comparison of raw THIN to CDM THIN was performed by execution and analysis of OMOP standardized reports and additional analyses. The practical value of CDM THIN for drug safety and pharmacoepidemiological research was assessed by implementing three analysis methods: Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Univariate Self-Case Control Series (USCCS) and High-Dimensional Propensity Score (HDPS). A published study using raw THIN data was selected to examine the external validity of CDM THIN.
RESULTS: Overall demographic characteristics were the same in both databases. Mapping medical and drug codes into the OMOP terminology dictionary was incomplete: 25 % medical codes and 55 % drug codes in raw THIN were not listed in the OMOP terminology dictionary, representing 6 % condition occurrence counts, 4 % procedure occurrence counts and 7 % drug exposure counts in raw THIN. Seven DOIs had <0.3 % and three DOIs had 1 % of unmapped drug exposure counts; each HOI had at least one definition with no or minimal (≤0.2 %) issues with unmapped condition occurrence counts, except for the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcer hospitalization cohort. The application of PRR, USCCS and HDPS found, respectively, a sensitivity of 67, 78 and 50 %, and a specificity of 68, 59 and 76 %, suggesting that safety issues defined as known by the OMOP could be identified in CDM THIN, with imperfect performance. Similar PRR scores were produced using both CDM THIN and raw THIN, while the execution time was twice as fast on CDM THIN. There was close replication of demographic distribution, death rate and prescription pattern and trend in the published study population and the cohort of CDM THIN.
CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrated that information loss due to incomplete mapping of medical and drug codes as well as data structure in the current CDM THIN limits its use for all possible epidemiological evaluation studies. Current HOIs and DOIs predefined by the OMOP were constructed with minimal loss of information and can be used for active surveillance methodological research. The OMOP CDM THIN can be a valuable tool for multiple aspects of pharmacoepidemiological research when the unique features of UK Electronic Health Records are incorporated in the OMOP library.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329543     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-012-0009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  21 in total

1.  Exposure to tricyclic and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants and the risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Richard Hubbard; Paddy Farrington; Chris Smith; Liam Smeeth; Anne Tattersfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Guidelines for good database selection and use in pharmacoepidemiology research.

Authors:  Gillian C Hall; Brian Sauer; Alison Bourke; Jeffrey S Brown; Matthew W Reynolds; Robert LoCasale; Robert Lo Casale
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Feasibility study and methodology to create a quality-evaluated database of primary care data.

Authors:  Alison Bourke; Hassy Dattani; Michael Robinson
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting.

Authors:  A Bate; S J W Evans
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  The methodology of self-controlled case series studies.

Authors:  Heather J Whitaker; Mounia N Hocine; C Paddy Farrington
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Performance of a semi-automated approach for risk estimation using a common data model for longitudinal healthcare databases.

Authors:  Hoa Van Le; Kathleen J Beach; Gregory Powell; Ed Pattishall; Patrick Ryan; Robertino M Mera
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Rita Schinnar; Warren B Bilker; Xingmei Wang; Brian L Strom
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  A basic study design for expedited safety signal evaluation based on electronic healthcare data.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Disproportionality methods for pharmacovigilance in longitudinal observational databases.

Authors:  Ivan Zorych; David Madigan; Patrick Ryan; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases.

Authors:  Stephanie J Reisinger; Patrick B Ryan; Donald J O'Hara; Gregory E Powell; Jeffery L Painter; Edward N Pattishall; Jonathan A Morris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  32 in total

1.  Ongoing challenges in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Gerald J Dal Pan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Converting to a common data model: what is lost in translation? : Commentary on "fidelity assessment of a clinical practice research datalink conversion to the OMOP common data model".

Authors:  Peter R Rijnbeek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  ADEpedia-on-OHDSI: A next generation pharmacovigilance signal detection platform using the OHDSI common data model.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Kathryn J Ruddy; Na Hong; Shintaro Tsuji; Andrew Wen; Nilay D Shah; Guoqian Jiang
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Impact of risk minimisation measures on the use of strontium ranelate in Europe: a multi-national cohort study in 5 EU countries by the EU-ADR Alliance.

Authors:  K Berencsi; A Sami; M S Ali; K Marinier; N Deltour; S Perez-Gutthann; L Pedersen; P Rijnbeek; J Van der Lei; F Lapi; M Simonetti; C Reyes; M C J M Sturkenboom; D Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Using and improving distributed data networks to generate actionable evidence: the case of real-world outcomes in the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel system.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Brown; Judith C Maro; Michael Nguyen; Robert Ball
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Content Coverage Evaluation of the OMOP Vocabulary on the Transplant Domain Focusing on Concepts Relevant for Kidney Transplant Outcomes Analysis.

Authors:  Sylvia Cho; Margaret Sin; Demetra Tsapepas; Leigh-Anne Dale; Syed A Husain; Sumit Mohan; Karthik Natarajan
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Evaluation of Electronic Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Safety Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology in China.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Xiaofeng Zhou; Shuangqing Gao; Hongbo Lin; Yanming Xie; Yuji Feng; Kui Huang; Siyan Zhan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Understanding data requirements of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Edna C Shenvi; Daniella Meeker; Aziz A Boxwala
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  iT2DMS: a Standard-Based Diabetic Disease Data Repository and its Pilot Experiment on Diabetic Retinopathy Phenotyping and Examination Results Integration.

Authors:  Huiqun Wu; Yufang Wei; Yujuan Shang; Wei Shi; Lei Wang; Jingjing Li; Aimin Sang; Lili Shi; Kui Jiang; Jiancheng Dong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Clinical Predictive Modeling Development and Deployment through FHIR Web Services.

Authors:  Mohammed Khalilia; Myung Choi; Amelia Henderson; Sneha Iyengar; Mark Braunstein; Jimeng Sun
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.