Literature DB >> 23329468

Biologic scaffolds for musculotendinous tissue repair.

Neill J Turner1, Stephen F Badylak.   

Abstract

Traumatic injuries to the musculoskeletal system are common events and volumetric muscle loss (VML) is no longer a rare occurrence. Surgical intervention is typically the only option for restoration of partial function. Surgical intervention for VML however does not regenerate the lost tissue and typically results in alterations of both the anatomy and biomechanics at the site of injury. Non-traditional approaches to the restoration of functional musculoskeletal tissue, including those provided by tissue engineering and regenerative medicine strategies, become viable alternative therapies when the expected outcome is bleak. One such strategy involves the delivery of constructive cues and modulation of the micro-environmental niche via biologic scaffold materials. These materials ideally retain the native structure and composition of the extracellular matrix of the tissue from which they are derived. Some of the recent advances in the use of biologic scaffolds to target key stages of the musculotendinous repair process and promote the restoration of functional tissue are described herein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329468     DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v025a09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  23 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Actuation Systems for the Phenotype Commitment of Stem Cell-Based Tendon and Ligament Tissue Substitutes.

Authors:  Marco Govoni; Claudio Muscari; Joseph Lovecchio; Carlo Guarnieri; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Recent Scientific Advances Towards the Development of Tendon Healing Strategies.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; John D Sandy; Mandeep S Virk; Anthony A Romeo; Robert W Wysocki; Jorge O Galante; Katie J Trella; Anna Plaas; Vincent M Wang
Journal:  Curr Tissue Eng       Date:  2015

3.  Surgical treatment for muscle injuries.

Authors:  Leonardo Addêo Ramos; Rogério Teixeira de Carvalho; Rene Jorge Abdalla; Sheila Jean McNeill Ingham
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Translational strategies and challenges in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Stefanie Dimmeler; Sheng Ding; Thomas A Rando; Alan Trounson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Regenerative medicine: Selecting the right biological scaffold for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jochen Ringe; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Decellularization and cell seeding of whole liver biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Denver M Faulk; Justin D Wildemann; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-03-28

8.  Regenerative Rehabilitation: Combining Stem Cell Therapies and Activity-Dependent Stimulation.

Authors:  Chet T Moritz; Fabrisia Ambrosio
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.049

9.  Decellularized dermal strip as a suburethral sling in a rat model of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Sarah Mozafarpour; Seyedeh Sanam Ladi Seyedian; Reza Khorramirouz; Haleh Nasser Hojjati
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Christopher L Dearth; Sonya B Sonnenberg; Elizabeth G Loboa; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.