Literature DB >> 23329383

The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges ahead.

Andreas Kirisits1, W Ken Redekop.   

Abstract

The economic evaluation of medical technology has evolved as a key element in supporting health budget allocation decisions. Among suppliers of innovation, the medical device industry is one of the most dynamic fields of medical progress with thousands of new products marketed every year. Accordingly, the broad variety of technologies covered by the umbrella term 'medical devices' have come under increasing scrutiny regarding their cost effectiveness. In the process, a number of device-specific factors have become apparent, each of which can complicate a thorough economic evaluation and limit its informative value. Some of these factors relate to specific characteristics of device functioning. Examples of such factors include the fact that most technologies require, or form part of, a procedure and that many devices have multiple indications or purposes. Others in turn reflect external conditions and are more general in character, such as the regulatory framework that a medical device manufacturer faces prior to market approval and the structure of the medical device industry. Drawing on the available literature, these complicating factors and their practical implications are discussed and used as a basis to elaborate on the emerging challenges for the economic evaluation of medical devices.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329383     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-012-0006-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  9 in total

1.  Resource modelling: the missing piece of the HTA jigsaw?

Authors:  Praveen Thokala; Simon Dixon; Beate Jahn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Laura T Burgers; William K Redekop; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Britni Wilcher; Carl Rudolf Blankart; Maximilian Hatz; Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Renata Slabe Erker; Yauheniya Varabyova; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices.

Authors:  Maximilian Blüher; Sita J Saunders; Virginie Mittard; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Jason A Davis; Rhodri Saunders
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Mobile Diary App Versus Paper-Based Diary Cards for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Astrid Langergaard; Sidsel Lund Laursen; Stig Helweg-Jørgensen; Jesper Søndergaard; Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen; Kim Mathiasen; Mia Beck Lichtenstein; Lars Holger Ehlers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Medical Device Product Innovation Choices in Asia: An Empirical Analysis Based on Product Space.

Authors:  Feng Hu; Liping Qiu; Haiyan Zhou
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 7.  Health technology assessment of medical devices: current landscape, challenges, and a way forward.

Authors:  Jian Ming; Yunzhen He; Yi Yang; Min Hu; Xinran Zhao; Jun Liu; Yang Xie; Yan Wei; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-10-05

8.  Preliminary investigation of economics issues in hospitalized patients with stroke.

Authors:  Zahra Tolou-Ghamari; Vahid Shaygannejad; Fariborz Khorvash
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of the Level of Evidence in Economic Evaluations of Medical Devices: The Example of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Nicolas Martelli; Capucine Devaux; Hélène van den Brink; Judith Pineau; Patrice Prognon; Isabelle Borget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.