Literature DB >> 2332921

The cystic fibrosis gene: medical and social implications for heterozygote detection.

B S Wilfond1, N Fost.   

Abstract

The primary goal of mass screening programs for cystic fibrosis carriers should be to allow people to make more informed reproductive decisions. However, previous experience with genetic screening programs, including those for phenylketonuria and sickle cell disease, have revealed complex problems including error, confusion, and stigmatization. These problems could be greater with cystic fibrosis, since more than 8 million Americans may be carriers and entrepreneurial interests can be expected to promote screening in what could become a billion-dollar industry. The present frequency of the detectable mutation (delta F508), 75%, will complicate the counseling process. The sensitivity of the test to detect at-risk couples would be 56%. The cost of screening could be as much as $2.2 million for each cystic fibrosis birth avoided. Regardless of improvements in the detection rate, implementation of population screening should be delayed until pilot studies that demonstrate its safety and effectiveness are completed. While studies are in progress, preconception testing should be offered to adult relatives of cystic fibrosis patients as part of a comprehensive program following institutional review board approval for "compassionate use." The purpose of such review should be to ensure that strict standards of informed consent, education, quality control of the testing procedure, and counseling are followed. Primary care physicians who are unable to offer screening as part of such a comprehensive program should refer high-risk patients who would like to consider being tested to established centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2332921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

1.  Implications of human genome research: impact on graduate education in genetic counseling.

Authors:  Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Catherine Walsh Vockley; Elizabeth Conover
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Attitudes toward cystic fibrosis carrier and prenatal testing and utilization of carrier testing among relatives of individuals with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  DeeDee Lafayette; Dianne Abuelo; Mary Ann Passero; Umadevi Tantravahi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Principles and practicalities of carrier screening: attitudes of recent parents.

Authors:  J M Green
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Methods for analysis of multiple cystic fibrosis mutations.

Authors:  I S Ng; R Pace; M V Richard; K Kobayashi; B Kerem; L C Tsui; A L Beaudet
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A comparison of two approaches to education about carrier testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  K P Leonard; L K Bartholomew; P R Swank; G S Parcel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  DNA sampling and informed consent.

Authors:  B M Knoppers; C Laberge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Prenatal cystic fibrosis carrier testing: designing an information leaflet to meet the specific needs of the target population.

Authors:  M E Mennie; W A Liston; D J Brock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing in primary care: supply push or demand pull?

Authors:  H Bekker; M Modell; G Denniss; A Silver; C Mathew; M Bobrow; T Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

9.  Testing carrier status in siblings of patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  I Balfour-Lynn; S Madge; R Dinwiddie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5,161 pregnant women.

Authors:  D R Witt; C Schaefer; P Hallam; S Wi; B Blumberg; A Fishbach; J Holtzman; S Kornfeld; R Lee; L Nemzer; R Palmer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.