Literature DB >> 23328911

Augmented reality visualization using image overlay technology for MR-guided interventions: cadaveric bone biopsy at 1.5 T.

Jan Fritz1, Paweena U-Thainual, Tamas Ungi, Aaron J Flammang, Edward F McCarthy, Gabor Fichtinger, Iulian I Iordachita, John A Carrino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively test the hypothesis that image overlay technology facilitates accurate navigation for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided osseous biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prototype augmented reality image overlay system was used in conjunction with a clinical 1.5-T MR imaging system. Osseous biopsy of a total of 16 lesions was planned in 4 human cadavers with osseous metastases. A loadable module of 3D Slicer open-source medical image analysis and visualization software was developed and used for display of MR images, lesion identification, planning of virtual biopsy paths, and navigation of drill placement. The osseous drill biopsy was performed by maneuvering the drill along the displayed MR image containing the virtual biopsy path into the target. The drill placement and the final drill position were monitored by intermittent MR imaging. Outcome variables included successful drill placement, number of intermittent MR imaging control steps, target error, number of performed passes and tissue sampling, time requirements, and pathological analysis of the obtained osseous core specimens including adequacy of specimens, presence of tumor cells, and degree of necrosis.
RESULTS: A total of 16 osseous lesions were sampled with percutaneous osseous drill biopsy. Eight lesions were located in the osseous pelvis (8/16, 50%) and 8 (8/16, 50%) lesions were located in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Lesion size was 2.2 cm (1.1-3.5 cm). Four (2-8) MR imaging control steps were required. MR imaging demonstrated successful drill placement inside 16 of the 16 target lesions (100%). One needle pass was sufficient for accurate targeting of all lesions. One tissue sample was obtained in 8 of the 16 lesions (50%); 2, in 6 of the 16 lesions (38%); and 3, in 2 of the 16 lesions (12%). The target error was 4.3 mm (0.8-6.8 mm). Length of time required for biopsy of a single lesion was 38 minutes (20-55 minutes). Specimens of 15 of the 16 lesions (94%) were sufficient for pathological evaluation. Of those 15 diagnostic specimens, 14 (93%) contained neoplastic cells, whereas 1 (7%) specimen demonstrated bone marrow without evidence of neoplastic cells. Of those 14 diagnostic specimens, 11 (79%) were diagnostic for carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, which was concordant with the primary neoplasm, whereas, in 3 of the 14 diagnostic specimens (21%), the neoplastic cells were indeterminate.
CONCLUSIONS: Image overlay technology provided accurate navigation for the MR-guided biopsy of osseous lesions of the spine and the pelvis in human cadavers at 1.5 T. The high technical and diagnostic yield supports further evaluation with clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328911     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b9f86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  7 in total

1.  MR cone-beam CT fusion image overlay for fluoroscopically guided percutaneous biopsies in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Avnesh S Thakor; Premal A Patel; Richard Gu; Vanessa Rea; Joao Amaral; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-11-13

2.  Workflow for Visualization of Neuroimaging Data with an Augmented Reality Device.

Authors:  Christof Karmonik; Timothy B Boone; Rose Khavari
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Till Bay; Andrea B Rosskopf; José M Spirig; Florian Wanivenhaus; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-04

Review 5.  Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery Is Emerging from Proof of Concept Towards Clinical Studies: a Literature Review Explaining the Technology and Current State of the Art.

Authors:  Fabio A Casari; Nassir Navab; Laura A Hruby; Philipp Kriechling; Ricardo Nakamura; Romero Tori; Fátima de Lourdes Dos Santos Nunes; Marcelo C Queiroz; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-05

6.  PET/CT-guided versus CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies in the diagnosis of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: which is the better choice?

Authors:  Min-Hao Wu; Ling-Fei Xiao; Huo-Wen Liu; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Xiao-Xiao Liang; Yan Chen; Jun Lei; Zhou-Ming Deng
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 7.  XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Hirohito Hirata; Koji Otani; Maki Sugimoto; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Masaya Ueno; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.