Literature DB >> 23328836

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure.

Sameer V Nagpal1, Stamatios Lerakis, Peter B Flueckiger, Michael Halista, Patrick Willis, Peter C Block, John S Douglas, Douglas C Morris, David A Liff, James Stewart, Chethan Devireddy, Emir Veledar, Fadi B Nahab, Vasilis C Babaliaros.   

Abstract

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a treatment for cryptogenic stroke and migraine headache. The goal of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of patients treated with percutaneous PFO closure. Records of patients with percutaneous PFO closure at Emory University Hospital from February 2002 to July 2009 were reviewed. Follow-up telephone questionnaire and chart review assessed recurrent stroke, migraine, and complications. Data was reviewed on 414 consecutive patients. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 207 of patients, and mean follow up was 4.6 ± 2.0 years. Cryptogenic stroke was the primary indication for intervention in 193 (93%) patients. Thirteen (7%) patients had a recurrent neurologic event post closure. In patients with multiple neurological events at baseline, 17% (n = 11) had a recurrent event, compared with 2% (n = 2) of patients with a single neurological event prior to PFO-closure (P < 0.002). Post closure, migraine frequency and severity declined from 4.5 to 1.1 migraine/month (P < 0.01) and 7.2 to 3.6 out of 10 (P < 0.01) in patients with history of migraine (n = 60). Thirty-day mortality was 1% (n = 2). One patient had device erosion 5 years post-procedure requiring emergent surgery. Atrial fibrillation was newly diagnosed in 8 (4%) patients within 6 months. In conclusion, the long-term rate of recurrent stroke after PFO closure is low in patients with a single neurological event at baseline. Serious long-term complications after PFO closure are rare. PFO closure may decrease the frequency and severity of migraine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328836     DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318276b071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  5 in total

1.  Usefulness of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for hypoxia.

Authors:  Alyssa G Munkres; Timothy N Ball; Themistokles Chamogeorgakis; Kenneth A Ausloos; Shelley A Hall; James W Choi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2015-04

2.  Coincidental Impact of Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure on Migraine with and without Aura - A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Siddak M Kanwar; Amit Noheria; Christopher V DeSimone; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-01

3.  Cardiac tamponade following aortic root erosion by an Amplatzer PFO-Occluder in a 41-year-old woman: Only a matter of sizing?

Authors:  Holger H Sigusch; Berit Zimmermann; Thomas Kuntze; Jens Gerth
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 4.  Amplatzer Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device-Related Complications.

Authors:  Beshoy Iskander; Fatima Anwer; Federico Oliveri; Kakargias Fotios; Priyanka Panday; Ana P Arcia Franchini; Pousette Hamid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

5.  A time-series study of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: premature adoption?

Authors:  Kian Nian Lew; Gianni D Angelini; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.