Literature DB >> 23328566

Dynamic nature of nonculprit coronary artery lesion morphology in STEMI: a serial IVUS analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.

Zhijing Zhao1, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Gary S Mintz, Markus Jaster, So-Yeon Choi, Xiaofan Wu, Yong He, M Pauliina Margolis, Ovidiu Dressler, Ecaterina Cristea, Helen Parise, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W Stone, Akiko Maehara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to report the temporal stability of an untreated, nonculprit lesion phenotype in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
BACKGROUND: The temporal stability of the untreated, nonculprit lesion phenotype has been studied using intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology (IVUS) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, but not in STEMI patients.
METHODS: As part of a formal substudy of the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, baseline and 13-month follow-up IVUS was performed in 99 untreated nonculprit lesions in 63 STEMI patients. Lesions were classified as pathological intimal thickening (PIT), IVUS-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA), fibrotic plaque, or fibrocalcific plaque.
RESULTS: The frequency of TCFA increased from 41% at baseline to 54% at follow-up, whereas ThCFAs decreased from 41% to 34% and PIT decreased from 16% to 8%. Among the 41 lesions classified at baseline as TCFA, at follow-up, 32 (78%) were still classified as TCFA, whereas 9 (22%) were classified as ThCFAs or fibrotic plaques. An additional 21 lesions at follow-up were newly classified as TCFA, developing from either PIT or ThCFA. TCFA at baseline that evolved into non-TCFAs trended toward a more distal location than TCFA that did not change (p = 0.12). In lesions classified as TCFA, the minimum lumen area (MLA) decreased from 8.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.4 to 8.8) mm(2) at baseline to 7.8 (IQR: 7.2 to 8.4) mm(2) at follow-up, p < 0.05; this was associated with an increase in percent necrotic core at the MLA site (14% [IQR: 12 to 16] to 19% [IQR: 17 to 22], p < 0.0001) and over the entire length of the lesion (14% [IQR: 12 to 16] to 18% [IQR: 17 to 20], p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Untreated nonculprit lesions in STEMI patients frequently have TCFA morphology that does not change during 13-month follow-up and is accompanied by a decrease in MLA and an increase in necrotic core. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI]; NCT00433966).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328566     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  13 in total

1.  Predicting Locations of High-Risk Plaques in Coronary Arteries in Patients Receiving Statin Therapy.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Andreas Wahle; Zhi Chen; John J Lopez; Tomas Kovarnik; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Carlos G Santos-Gallego; Belen Picatoste; Juan José Badimón
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  New insights into the vulnerable plaque from imaging studies.

Authors:  Robert S Fenning; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Dynamic change of high-risk plaque detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with subclinical coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki; Takeshi Matsumoto
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Inflammation during the life cycle of the atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Peter Libby
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI).

Authors:  Issam D Moussa; Lloyd W Klein; Binita Shah; Roxana Mehran; Michael J Mack; Emmanouil S Brilakis; John P Reilly; Gilbert Zoghbi; Elizabeth Holper; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Role of biomechanical forces in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Adam J Brown; Zhongzhao Teng; Paul C Evans; Jonathan H Gillard; Habib Samady; Martin R Bennett
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Echogenicity as a surrogate for bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold degradation: analysis at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- 18, 24-, 30-, 36- and 42-month follow-up in a porcine model.

Authors:  Carlos M Campos; Yuki Ishibashi; Jeroen Eggermont; Shimpei Nakatani; Yun Kyeong Cho; Jouke Dijkstra; Johan H C Reiber; Alexander Sheehy; Jennifer Lane; Marika Kamberi; Richard Rapoza; Laura Perkins; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Evolution of nonculprit coronary atherosclerotic plaques assessed by serial virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Jeehoon Kang; Ki-Hyun Jeon; Seong-Wook Kim; Jin Joo Park; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Jung-Won Suh; Young-Seok Cho; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.439

10.  Plaque volume and plaque risk profile in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy: a study based on 3D intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology.

Authors:  Tomas Kovarnik; Zhi Chen; Gary S Mintz; Andreas Wahle; Kristyna Bayerova; Ales Kral; Martin Chval; Karel Kopriva; John Lopez; Milan Sonka; Ales Linhart
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.