Literature DB >> 23328452

New strategies for the evaluation of the nadir bone marrow following induction in acute myeloid leukemia.

Ryan J Mattison1, Selina M Luger, Hillard M Lazarus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) routinely undergo a bone marrow biopsy 7-10 days after induction chemotherapy to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Measuring blast count by morphology alone has been the standard hematopathologic technique. Although helpful to guide future treatment decisions, the early bone marrow does not predict well which patients will achieve complete remission, and ultimately be cured. New methods of assessing early treatment effectiveness are being developed. This review summarizes the current utility of early bone marrow evaluations and looks toward future developments. RECENT
FINDINGS: More sensitive techniques than light microscopy are available to analyze the presence or absence of leukemia after treatment. These include flow-cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based assays, and their use is playing a larger role in monitoring therapy effectiveness after induction and during consolidation. Importantly, novel techniques including enzymatic amplification staining (performed on bone marrow samples) and noninvasive molecular imaging have been studied and may play a role in future therapy asessment.
SUMMARY: Identifying and implementing new tools to measure therapy effectiveness will be an important component of improving outcomes for patients with AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328452     DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32835d8207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol        ISSN: 1065-6251            Impact factor:   3.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow evaluation for diagnosis and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Catherine Lai; Elihu Estey; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 2.  Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Jaso; S A Wang; J L Jorgensen; P Lin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Value of routine 'day 14' marrow exam in newly diagnosed AML.

Authors:  T Yezefski; H Xie; R Walter; J Pagel; P S Becker; P Hendrie; V Sandhu; K Shannon-Dorcy; J Abkowitz; F R Appelbaum; E Estey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Re-induction therapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia with ≤20 % blasts: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kavya K Kannan; Paz Vellanki; Scott Isom; Bernard Tawfik; Allison Winter; Heidi D Klepin; Leslie R Ellis; Rupali Roy Bhave; Dianna Howard; Megan Manuel; Sarah Dralle; Susan Lyerly; Bayard L Powell; Timothy S Pardee
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Early assessment of response to induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia using 18F-FLT PET/CT.

Authors:  Eun Ji Han; Bo-Hee Lee; Jeong-A Kim; Young Ha Park; Woo Hee Choi
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Are patients open to elective re-sampling of their glioblastoma? A new way of assessing treatment innovations.

Authors:  Taskia Mir; Peter Dirks; Warren P Mason; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.