Literature DB >> 23328324

Serum concentration of fentanyl during conversion from intravenous to transdermal administration to patients with chronic cancer pain.

Motoo Nomura1, Koichi Inoue, Shoko Matsushita, Daisuke Takahari, Chihiro Kondoh, Kohei Shitara, Takashi Ura, Kenji Hayashi, Hiroyuki Kojima, Minoru Kamata, Michiko Tatematsu, Renko Hosoda, Satoshi Sawada, Hisao Oka, Kei Muro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during the conversion from continuous intravenous infusion (CII) to transdermal fentanyl administration. The primary objective of the present study was to clarify the pharmacokinetic characteristics during this conversion. A secondary objective was to identify an association between serum albumin and the absorption of fentanyl from the transdermal patch.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from February 2010 to August 2011 that enrolled 19 patients with chronic cancer pain. Patients were classified into 2 study groups according to body mass index and albumin level. All patients received the conversion from CII to transdermal fentanyl using a 2-step taper of CII over 6 hours. Comparisons of efficacy, toxicity, and serum fentanyl concentrations between study groups were analyzed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 hours after initiation of the conversion.
RESULTS: The dose-adjusted serum fentanyl concentrations for all patients were significantly decreased at 15 to 24 hours after conversion compared with baseline, although pain intensity and the number of rescue events remained stable during the conversion. The dose-adjusted serum fentanyl concentrations at 9 to 24 hours were significantly reduced in the low albumin group compared with the normal albumin group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the dose-adjusted serum fentanyl concentrations remained relatively stable, and pain intensity and the number of rescue events remained stable during conversion. Hypoalbuminemia was strongly associated with poor absorption of transdermally administered fentanyl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328324     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318266f6a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of factors explaining variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics; focus on implications for cancer patients.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Maarten L Zandvliet; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Characterizing Fentanyl Variability Using Population Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Burn Patients.

Authors:  Kristin N Grimsrud; Kelly M Lima; Nam K Tran; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.819

3.  Effects of smoking and body mass index on the exposure of fentanyl in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Martine F Thijs-Visser; Peter de Bruijn; Astrid W Oosten; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Stijn L W Koolen; Carin C D Van der Rijt; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Treatment with subcutaneous and transdermal fentanyl: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in cancer patients.

Authors:  Astrid W Oosten; João A Abrantes; Siv Jönsson; Peter de Bruijn; Evelien J M Kuip; Amílcar Falcão; Carin C D van der Rijt; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.