Literature DB >> 23328311

Feasibility of a multdisciplinary lung cancer videoconference between a peripheral hospital and a comprehensive cancer centre.

A Seeber1, M Mitterer, E Gunsilius, G Mazzoleni, R Giovannetti, M Farsad, W Eisterer, G Gastl, G Pall, A Wieser, P Lukas, M Wimmer, G Spizzo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of lung cancer patients is changing rapidly and new treatment options have emerged in recent years. In 2007, to guarantee the best treatment procedure for lung cancer patients being treated in our peripheral hospital, we decided to introduce an interdisciplinary tumour videoconference between the Haemato-Oncological Day Hospital in Merano and the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Innsbruck. This retrospective analysis aims to describe the feasibility of such a conference. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and three patients with lung cancer treated at the peripheral hospital of Merano between May 2003 until May 2011 were retrospectively analysed. After introduction of the tumour videoconference in 2007, 54% (n = 110) of the patients in this cohort were discussed in the conference.
RESULTS: One hundred and four videoconferences were performed. Videoconference was feasible for 110 patients. Radiotherapeutic treatments were prescribed more frequently in patients from the conference group. Overall, major and minor treatment changes were undertaken in 7% (n = 8) and 18% (n = 20), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary tumour videoconference is feasible between a peripheral hospital and a comprehensive cancer centre. Radiotherapeutic treatment was prescribed more frequently, suggesting that such a conference facilitates the access to cancer-centre-specific treatment modalities. Accordingly, tumour videoconference between a peripheral hospital and a cancer centre is to be recommend.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328311     DOI: 10.1159/000345314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  6 in total

1.  Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: a prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance.

Authors:  Christy L Marshall; Nancy J Petersen; Aanand D Naik; Nancy Vander Velde; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger; Daniel A Anaya
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  TELEHEALTH ALLOWS FOR CLINICAL TRIAL PARTICIPATION AND MULTIMODALITY THERAPY IN A RURAL PATIENT WITH STAGE 4 NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER.

Authors:  James M Clark; Laurence J Heifetz; Daphne Palmer; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke; Elizabeth A David
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2016

3.  The effect of weekly specialist palliative care teleconsultations in patients with advanced cancer -a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Patrick D Hoek; Henk J Schers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Kris C P Vissers; Jeroen G J Hasselaar
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Teleconsultation and Clinical Decision Making: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kolsoum Deldar; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy; Seyed Mahmood Tara
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-07-16

5.  Does multidisciplinary videoconferencing between a head-and-neck cancer centre and its partner hospital add value to their patient care and decision-making? A mixed-method evaluation.

Authors:  Lidia S van Huizen; Pieter Dijkstra; Gyorgy B Halmos; Johanna G M van den Hoek; Klaas T van der Laan; Oda B Wijers; Kees Ahaus; Jan G A M de Visscher; Jan Roodenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Benefits and drawbacks of videoconferencing for collaborating multidisciplinary teams in regional oncology networks: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lidia S van Huizen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Sjoukje van der Werf; Kees Ahaus; Jan Ln Roodenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.