Literature DB >> 23327900

Comparison between 18F-FDG PET image-derived indices for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Mathieu Hatt1, David Groheux, Antoine Martineau, Marc Espié, Elif Hindié, Sylvie Giacchetti, Anne de Roquancourt, Dimitris Visvikis, Catherine Cheze-Le Rest.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The goal of this study was to determine the best predictive factor among image-derived parameters extracted from sequential (18)F-FDG PET scans for early tumor response prediction after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
METHODS: 51 breast cancer patients were included. Responder and nonresponder status was determined by histopathologic examination according to the tumor and node Sataloff scale. PET indices (maximum and mean standardized uptake value [SUV], metabolically active tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), at baseline and their variation (Δ) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were extracted from the PET images. Their predictive value was investigated using Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Subgroup analysis was also performed by considering estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, triple-negative, and HER2-positive tumors separately. The impact of partial-volume correction was also investigated using an iterative deconvolution algorithm.
RESULTS: There were 24 pathologic nonresponders and 27 responders. None of the baseline PET parameters was correlated with response. After 2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, the reduction of each parameter was significantly associated with response, the best prediction of response being obtained with ΔTLG (96% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 94% accuracy), which had a significantly higher area under the curve (0.91 vs. 0.82, P = 0.01) than did ΔSUVmax (63% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 77% accuracy). Subgroup analysis confirmed a significantly higher accuracy for ΔTLG than ΔSUV for ER-positive/HER-negative but not for triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors. Partial-volume correction had no impact on the predictive value of any of the PET image-derived parameters despite significant changes in their absolute values.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the reduction after 2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles of the metabolically active volume of primary tumor measurements such as ΔTLG predicts histopathologic tumor response with higher accuracy than does ΔSUV measurements, especially for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. These results should be confirmed in a larger group of patients as they may potentially increase the clinical value and efficiency of (18)F-FDG PET for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23327900     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.108837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  38 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  A Phase II Study of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET in the Assessment of Early Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results from ACRIN 6688.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Fenghai Duan; Michael O Idowu; Paul R Jolles; Harry D Bear; Mark Muzi; Jean Cormack; John P Muzi; Daniel A Pryma; Jennifer M Specht; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; John Miliziano; Sharon Mallett; Anthony F Shields; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Fangfang Tian; Guohua Shen; Yunfu Deng; Wei Diao; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

6.  Correlation between tumour characteristics, SUV measurements, metabolic tumour volume, TLG and textural features assessed with 18F-FDG PET in a large cohort of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Charles Lemarignier; Antoine Martineau; Luis Teixeira; Laetitia Vercellino; Marc Espié; Pascal Merlet; David Groheux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  David Groheux; David Mankoff; Marc Espié; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Tyler Bradshaw; Meiyappan Solaiyappan; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19

9.  Combined use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth E Pengel; Bas B Koolen; Claudette E Loo; Wouter V Vogel; Jelle Wesseling; Esther H Lips; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Marie Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Won Hwa Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Mi Young Kim; Jin You Kim; Mirinae Seo; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.