| Literature DB >> 23326397 |
Christian Fung1, Gian Marco De Marchis, Mira Katan, Marleen Seiler, Marcel Arnold, Jan Gralla, Andreas Raabe, Jürgen Beck.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Grading of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is often confounded by seizure, hydrocephalus or sedation and the prediction of prognosis remains difficult. Recently, copeptin has been identified as a serum marker for outcomes in acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We investigated whether copeptin might serve as a marker for severity and prognosis in aSAH.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23326397 PMCID: PMC3543451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Copeptin levels and characteristics of study patients.
| n | Median copeptin level (IQR) (pmol/L) | p-value | |
|
| |||
| Good-grade | 11 | 6.8 (6.6–17.4) | |
| Poor-grade | 7 | 26.3 (18.3–204) |
|
|
| |||
| Diffuse blood (Fisher grade 2 and 4) | 3 | 1.6 (1.5–3.3) | |
| Thick clot (Fisher grade 3) | 15 | 18.3 (6.8–60.4) |
|
|
| |||
| Yes | 6 | 52.5 (17.4–204) | |
| No | 12 | 6.7 (2.2–22.3) |
|
|
| |||
| Yes | 11 | 17.4 (6.6–38.4) | |
| No | 7 | 7.1 (1.6–79.9) | P = 0.89 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 12 | 17.9 (5–32.4) | |
| No | 6 | 6.7 (3.3–60.4) | P = 0.682 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 5 | 26.3 (24.5–60.4) | |
| No | 13 | 7.1 (2.8–18.3) | P = 0.15 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 3 | 24.5 (1.3–60.4) | |
| No | 15 | 16.5 (3.3–38.4) | P = 1.0 |
|
| |||
| Male | 6 | 21.4 (12.7–94.3) | |
| Female | 12 | 7 (2.9–51.9) | P = 0.5 |
|
| |||
| Anterior circulation | 11 | 17.4 (6.8–60.4) | |
| Posterior circulation | 4 | 2.2 (1.4–29.5) | P = 0.38 |
|
| |||
| Good | 13 | 6.8 (2.8–24.5) | |
| Poor | 5 | 26.3 (17.4–204) | P = 0.054 |
|
| |||
| Survivors | 14 | 7.0 (2.8–38.4) | |
| Deceased | 4 | 21.9 (17–115.2) | P = 0.277 |
IQR: interquartile range; WFNS: World Federation of Neurological Surgeons; ICH: intracerebral hemorrhage; IVH: intraventricular hemorrhage.
WFNS grade: Good-grade WFNS 1–3; Poor-grade: WFNS 4–5.
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–3: Good outcome; mRS 4–6: Poor outcome.
Figure 1Copeptin Level by WFNS Grade.
The figure represents a boxplot of copeptin values per WFNS grade. Displayed are lowest, highest and median copeptin values (pmol/L), with upper (75%) and lower (25%) quartiles.