Literature DB >> 23326071

False-positive "halo" sign on testicular scintigraphy in a 5-year-old boy with epididymitis and hydrocele.

Sampath Santhosh1, Poonam Guha, Anish Bhattacharya, Monika Bawa, Bhagwant Rai Mittal.   

Abstract

Scintigraphic differentiation between acute torsion, hydrocele and testicular or scrotal abscess can be difficult. Doppler sonography may provide useful complimentary information toward diagnosis. The authors describe a 5-year-old child where epididymitis with hydrocele was misdiagnosed as testicular torsion on scrotal scintigraphy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epididymitis; halo sign; hydrocele; testicular scan; torsion

Year:  2011        PMID: 23326071      PMCID: PMC3543585          DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.104002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0974-0244


INTRODUCTION

99mTc pertechnetate scintigraphy is routinely used to detect testicular torsion and differentiate this condition from acute epididymo-orchitis. However, differentiation of torsion from hydrocele and testicular or scrotal abscess may be difficult. In this report, we present a 5-year old child in whom epididymitis with hydrocele was misdiagnosed as testicular torsion on scrotal scintigraphy.

CASE REPORT

A 5-year-old boy presented to the pediatric emergency department with a complaint of left scrotal swelling and local tenderness for 7 h. Doppler ultrasound (US) imaging showed mild hydrocele of the left scrotum with no e/o torsion of the left testis. Scrotal scintigraphy was then performed after intravenous injection of 10 mCi of 99mTc pertechnetate. Static images at 5 and 10 min showed a halo-like pooling of tracer in the periphery of the left hemi-scrotum with a photopenic center and normal tracer uptake in the right hemi-scrotum [Figure 1]. A scintigraphic diagnosis of mid-phase testicular torsion of the left testis was made and the patient was immediately operated. However, it was discovered intraoperatively that the patient had epididymitis with a hydrocele and not torsion of the left testis.
Figure 1

Scrotal scintigraphy following intravenous injection of 10 mCi of 99mTc pertechnetate. Static images at 5 and 10 min show a halo-like pooling of tracer in the periphery of the left hemi-scrotum (arrow) with a photopenic centre. Normal tracer uptake is seen in the right hemi-scrotum

Scrotal scintigraphy following intravenous injection of 10 mCi of 99mTc pertechnetate. Static images at 5 and 10 min show a halo-like pooling of tracer in the periphery of the left hemi-scrotum (arrow) with a photopenic centre. Normal tracer uptake is seen in the right hemi-scrotum Differentiation by scintigraphy between acute torsion, hydrocele, testicular or scrotal abscess, or even inguinal hernia can be difficult, and images must be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings from scrotal transillumination. In this situation, sonography can provide useful complementary information.[1-4] In a previous study comparing scintigraphy and US in children with scrotal pain, Doppler US was able to provide the diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis in cases of false-positive scintigraphy.[1] A peri-testicular hyperemic rim on radionuclide scrotal scintigraphy is not pathognomonic of missed testicular torsion.[5] Epididymitis and hydrocele have also been reported to mimic testicular torsion on scintigraphy in adults.[6-8] The present study describes a halo-like appearance on scrotal scintigraphy caused by epididymitis with co-existing hydrocele in a clinical setting, suggestive of testicular torsion in a child.
  8 in total

1.  Hydrocele mimicking testicular torsion on radionuclide and ultrasound studies.

Authors:  N Erbay; S L Brown; R P Spencer
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Hydrocele and epididymitis mimicking testicular torsion on scrotal scintigraphy.

Authors:  C J Palestro; C Finn
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Nonspecificity of the "rim sign" in the scintigraphic diagnosis of missed testicular torsion.

Authors:  F Vieras; C R Kuhn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical study of scrotum scintigraphy in 49 patients with acute scrotal pain: a comparison with ultrasonography.

Authors:  Z Yuan; Q Luo; L Chen; J Zhu; R Zhu
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 5.  A false-positive scan for testicular torsion and false-negative scan for epididymitis.

Authors:  A S Rosenson; A Ali; E W Fordham; A Chaviano
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Acute scrotal symptoms in boys with an indeterminate clinical presentation: comparison of color Doppler sonography and scintigraphy.

Authors:  H J Paltiel; L P Connolly; A Atala; A D Paltiel; D Zurakowski; S T Treves
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prospective comparison of colour Doppler ultrasonography and testicular scintigraphy in acute scrotum.

Authors:  T Karadeniz; M Topsakal; A Ariman; A Eksioglu; H Erton; T Ozpacaci; D Basak
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Color Doppler sonography and scintigraphy of the testis: a prospective, comparative analysis in children with acute scrotal pain.

Authors:  Anna R Nussbaum Blask; Dorothy Bulas; Eglal Shalaby-Rana; Gil Rushton; Cheng Shao; Massoud Majd
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.454

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Incremental Role of 18FDG PET/CT in Assessment of Testicular Viability.

Authors:  Venkata Subramanian Krishnaraju; Dharmender Malik; Rajender Kumar; Giridhar S Bora; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Anish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.