| Literature DB >> 23326010 |
R Albera1, A Canale, E Piumetto, M Lacilla, F Dagna.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to describe ossicle resorption in chronic otitis with cholesteatoma and correlate it with clinical parameters such as age, contralateral ear condition, tympanic membrane aspect, cholesteatoma pathogenesis and extension, associated lesions and hearing threshold. Preoperative clinical data were collected for 140 patients with chronic otitis with cholesteatoma, whose ossicles were evaluated during surgery. 82% of patients showed ossicle resorption, with incus damage in 78% of cases. Multiple involvement was found in 45% of cases and the incus-stapes association was the most frequent. In 13 patients (11%) with ossicle damage, the ossicular chain was in continuity with a hearing threshold similar to patients without ossicular resorption. Ossicles were always damaged in congenital cholesteatoma and in case of associated lesions. Cholesteatoma extension was related to the incidence of ossicle resorption (p < 0.0001). Air and bone conduction worsened as the number of involved ossicles increased, while the air-bone gap remained stable. In conclusion, the origin and location of cholesteatoma are related to the site of ossicular damage, which is subsequent to the contact between bone and cholesteatoma. Pure-tone audiometry and air-bone gap do not reflect actual ossicular chain status. None of the other preoperative clinical parameters considered were reliable predictors of the condition of the ossicular chain.Entities:
Keywords: Cholesteatoma; Chronic otitis; Ossicular chain
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23326010 PMCID: PMC3546406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ISSN: 0392-100X Impact factor: 2.124
Clinical data.
| Normal | 79 (56%) | ||
| Chronic otitis | 61 (44%) | ||
| Normal | 12 (8%) | Posterior attical retraction | 9 (7%) |
| Atelectasis | 13 (9%) | Anterior attical retraction | 10 (8%) |
| Posterior perforation | 12 (8%) | Total attical retraction | 10 (8%) |
| Subtotal perforation | 7 (5%) | Posterior pars tensa retraction | 67 (47%) |
| Congenital | 12 (9%) | Atrium | 59 (42%) |
| Migration | 16 (11%) | Atrium- atticus | 53 (38%) |
| Retraction | 112 (80%) | Atrium-atticus-antrum | 28 (20%) |
| None | 117 (83%) | Cochlea | 1 (1%) |
| HSC | 4 (3%) | Facial nerve | 8 (6%) |
| SSC | 1 (1%) | HSC-Facial nerve | 9 (6%) |
Fig. 1.Distribution of ossicular lesions.
Fig. 2.Distribution of ossicle lesions in patients with normal ossicular chain function.
Distribution of lesions in each ossicle.
| Malleus | n (%) | Incus | n (%) | Stapes | n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No lesion | 112 (80%) | Normal | 31 (22%) | Normal | 99 (71%) |
| Head | 14 (10%) | Body | 5 (4%) | Crura | 41 (29%) |
| Handle | 4 (3%) | Long process | 61 (45%) | ||
| Absence | 10 (7%) | Absence | 43 (31%) |
Relationship between clinical parameters and condition of the ossicular chain.
| Other ear | Normal ossicular chain | Eroded ossicular chain |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 11 (18%) | 68 (82%) |
| Chronic otitis | 14 (23%) | 47 (77%) |
| Congenital | 0 (0%) | 12 (100%) |
| Migration | 3 (19%) | 13 (81%) |
| Retraction | 22 (20%) | 90 (80%) |
| Normal | 0 (0%) | 12 (100%) |
| Posterior perforation | 2 (17%) | 10 (83%) |
| Subtotal perforation | 1 (14%) | 6 (86%) |
| Anterior attical retraction | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) |
| Posterior attical retraction | 2 (22%) | 7 (78%) |
| Total attical retraction | 0 (0%) | 10 (100%) |
| Posterior pars tensa retraction | 15 (22%) | 52 (78%) |
| 1 | 20 (34%) | 39 (66%) |
| 2 | 5 (9%) | 48 (91%) |
| 3 | 0 (0%) | 28 (100%) |
| No | 16 (23%) | 52 (77%) |
| Yes | 9 (12%) | 63 (88%) |
| No | 25 (21%) | 92 (79%) |
| Yes | 0 (0%) | 23 (100%) |
Relationship between hearing level and condition of the ossicular chain.
| Ossicular chain condition (n) | AC (SD) | BC (SD) | ABG (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (35) | 36 (20) | 18 (13) | 19 (12) |
| Pathological with integrity (13) | 34 (13) | 16 (5) | 17 (10) |
| Pathological without integrity (102) | 54 (18) | 26 (17) | 28 (12) |
| p | <0.0001 | <0.05 | <0.0001 |
AC = air conduction; BC = bone conduction; ABG = air-bone gap. Values, expressed in dB, represent the average threshold at 0.5-1-2-4 kHz at pure-tone audiometry; standard deviation (SD) values in brackets. Differences are significant by chi-square test (*).
Relationship between hearing level and type of ossicular chain defect in the 102 patients who showed ossicular chain lesions.
| Ossicular chain condition (n) | AC (SD) | BC (SD) | ABG (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malleus (3) | 48 (18) | 18 (5) | 30 (15) |
| Incus (48) | 48 (18) | 23 (14) | 25 (10) |
| Stapes (3) | 58 (6) | 29 (8) | 29 (8) |
| Malleus-incus (11) | 49 (22) | 24 (12) | 25 (13) |
| Incus-Stapes (26) | 53 (16) | 24 (17) | 30 (15) |
| Malleus-Incus-Stapes (11) | 71 (18) | 39 (30) | 32 (16) |
| p | <0.0001 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
AC = air conduction; BC = bone conduction; ABG = air-bone gap. Values, expressed in dB, represent the average thresholds at 0.5-1-2-4 kHz at pure-tone audiometry; standard deviation (SD) in brackets. Differences are significant by chi-square test (*).
Fig. 3.Hearing thresholds in relation to the number of involved ossicles.