Literature DB >> 23325982

High-pressure injection injury of the finger.

Sanjay Saraf1.   

Abstract

The high-pressure injection injuries are unusual injuries and the extent of tissue damage is often under estimated. They represent potentially disabling forms of trauma and have disastrous effects on tissues if not treated promptly. We present a case of high pressure injection injury to the finger from lubricant oil. The patient presented late with necrosis of volar tissue of left index finger. The patient was aggressively managed in stages, with delayed flap cover, with satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-pressure injury; finger; injection injury

Year:  2012        PMID: 23325982      PMCID: PMC3543897          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.49384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


INTRODUCTION

High pressure injection (HPI) injuries to the hand are relatively uncommon. They are caused by high-pressure guns emitting jet streams at pressures exceeding thousands of psi (pound force per square inch). This extreme pressure forces the material through poorly distensible digital or palmar tissues and leads to diffusion along fascial planes, tendon sheaths, and neurovascular bundles with resultant significant damage.1 The most commonly injected materials in HPI injury to the hand include paint, automotive grease, solvents, and diesel oil.2–4 The injected material has deleterious effects in many ways including direct toxic effect of the involved chemical, ischemia, high-velocity mechanical impact, secondary infection, and raised pressure into the closed digital space.5–10 Early recognition and treatment of these injuries is important as delay may result in compromised function of the hand or even the amputation of a digit.210–12

CASE REPORT

A 57 year-old man presented with a painful, swollen, and discolored left index finger. The patient had sustained a high-pressure injection injury by lubricant injector (pressure being around 5000 psi) a week ago. There was a small puncture wound just proximal to the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint crease with surrounding induration along with loss of sensations and compromised vascularity of the volar skin, distal to the proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joint crease [Figure 1a]. The capillary refill was found to be sluggish and the oxygen saturation [SpO2] probe showed no signals. The X-ray of the finger was suggestive of soft-tissue swelling with no radio opacities. The patient was aggressively managed in stages. First, the wound was explored with Brunner's zig-zag incision with immediate decompression and debridement of necrotic tissue and foreign material. The wound was left open and dressed. After 2 days, a second look was given and further debridement of the non-viable volar tissue was done [Figure 1b]. The resultant volar defect with exposed tendons on the left index finger was covered by a superior based abdominal flap [Figure 2a]. The flap was delayed after 3 weeks, with final insetting after 6 days, with satisfactory result [Figure 2b]. At 3 months follow-up, the flexion at DIP and PIP joints was satisfactory allowing the patient to return to his pre injury occupation [Figure 2c].
Figure 1

(a) Clinical photograph of the left index finger depicting a small puncture wound just proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint crease with surrounding induration along with loss of sensations and compromised vascularity of the volar skin, distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint crease. (b) The wound was explored with a Brunner's zig-zag incision. The photograph shows the resultant volar defect with exposed tendons after final wound debridement

Figure 2

(a) Clinical photograph depicting coverage of the volar defect over the left index finger by superior based abdominal flap and (b) the resultant final appearance and (c) function at 3 months.

(a) Clinical photograph of the left index finger depicting a small puncture wound just proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint crease with surrounding induration along with loss of sensations and compromised vascularity of the volar skin, distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint crease. (b) The wound was explored with a Brunner's zig-zag incision. The photograph shows the resultant volar defect with exposed tendons after final wound debridement (a) Clinical photograph depicting coverage of the volar defect over the left index finger by superior based abdominal flap and (b) the resultant final appearance and (c) function at 3 months.

DISCUSSION

The exact incidence of HPI injuries is difficult to assess, but the incidence could be significant, given the widespread use of pressure machinery in industry. Over a hundred cases of HPI injuries involving hand have been documented in the literature. The first reported case was described by Hesse (1925) and Rees (1937) published the first case involving diesel fuel.1314 The HPI injuries typically occur to the nondominant hand, and the index finger is the usually affected site. The palm and middle finger are next most frequently injured.21015 The point of entrance is often deceptively small [Figure 1a]. In HPI injuries to the hand, the foreign materials are accidentally injected under a high injection pressure of 141-703 kg/cm2.16 The morbidity is dependent to a large extent upon the type of material injected. The most commonly injected materials are automotive grease, diesel oil, paint and other solvents.2–4 The severity is related to the nature, pressure, volume, viscosity, anatomical level of injection, toxicity of the injected substance, secondary infection and the time interval between the injury and management.61012 The chemical properties of the injected material have a profound effect. In high-viscosity substances, such as grease and oil-based compounds, dispersion is less marked compared with more fluid materials. Low-viscosity solvents, such as paints and paint thinners produce the most severe inflammatory responses and more damage because of rapid lipid dissolution and destruction of tissues.1017 They are associated with a high incidence of subsequent amputation. Grease and oil based compounds may lead to oleogranulomas with chronic fistula formation, scarring, and eventual loss of digit function.2617 Various mechanisms have been used to explain the effects of HPI injuries. They include the direct toxic effect of the involved chemical, ischemia, necrosis from high-velocity mechanical impact, and infection.5–710 Factors contributing to digital ischemia include massive vessel thrombosis from volatilization of the injected material, temporary vascular spasm, venous outflow obstruction, and digital artery compression from compartment effect.8 The chemical toxicity has been considered as a significant mechanism of tissue damage, more than the ischemia. In the digits, amputation rates are reported to be as high as 48%.210 The early treatment of these injuries is mandatory, with decompression and evacuation of the foreign material from the digits. The associated medical management includes tetanus toxoid, broad-spectrum antibiotics and analgesics. The role of steroids is not well defined, but they are used as an adjunct, which has been suggested for severe cases.1018 If a digit is initially cool or poorly perfused, early amputation might have to be considered.1019 The Esmarch bandage should be avoided during surgery for homeostasis as the pressure disseminates the foreign material further. The patient should be operated under general anesthesia and digital or local nerve blocks are contraindicated. The use of solvents other than isotonic sodium chloride solution for irrigation of wound is not recommended.520 Soft tissue reconstruction, capsulotomy, neurolysis, and tenolysis might need to be considered to restore maximal function.10 In cases of involvement of tip of index finger and the thumb, restoration of the tip sensation by a sensate flap might need to be considered. Lastly, regular follow-up and early intensive rehabilitation is a must to achieve optimal functional outcome. To conclude, HPI injuries are surgical emergencies that demand prompt diagnosis and treatment. The early recognition and management of condition is the key to successful management.
  18 in total

Review 1.  High-pressure hand injection injuries caused by dry cleaning solvents: case reports, review of the literature, and treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Karol A Gutowski; Jason Chu; Mihye Choi; David W Friedman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  High-pressure injection injuries of the hand.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; J L Posch; J M Jurist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A case of high pressure hydraulic tool injury to the hand, its treatment aided by dexamethasone and a plea for further trial of this substance.

Authors:  R W BOTTOMS
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1962-10-13       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  High-pressure injection injuries of the hand. A review.

Authors:  C A Sirio; J S Smith; W P Graham
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 5.  High pressure injection injuries: an overview.

Authors:  J A Fialkov; A Freiberg
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 6.  High-pressure injection injuries to the upper extremity: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher J Hogan; Robert T Ruland
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  High-pressure paint gun injuries of hand: clinical and roentgen aspects.

Authors:  F P Agha
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1978-10

8.  High-pressure injection injury: a hand-threatening emergency.

Authors:  A Karlbauer; F Gasperschitz
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  High-pressure water injection injury to the hand.

Authors:  P A Curka; C D Chisholm
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  High-pressure injection injuries.

Authors:  W Peters
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.