Literature DB >> 23325808

Geometric morphometric character suites as phylogenetic data: extracting phylogenetic signal from gastropod shells.

Ursula E Smith1, Jonathan R Hendricks.   

Abstract

Despite being the objects of numerous macroevolutionary studies, many of the best represented constituents of the fossil record-including diverse examples such as foraminifera, brachiopods, and mollusks-have mineralized skeletons with limited discrete characteristics, making morphological phylogenies difficult to construct. In contrast to their paucity of phylogenetic characters, the mineralized structures (tests and shells) of these fossil groups frequently have distinctive shapes that have long proved useful for their classification. The recent introduction of methodologies for including continuous data directly in a phylogenetic analysis has increased the number of available characters, making it possible to produce phylogenies based, in whole or part, on continuous character data collected from such taxa. Geometric morphometric methods provide tools for accurately characterizing shape variation and can produce quantitative data that can therefore now be included in a phylogenetic matrix in a nonarbitrary manner. Here, the marine gastropod genus Conus is used to evaluate the ability of continuous characters-generated from a geometric morphometric analysis of shell shape-to contribute to a total evidence phylogenetic hypothesis constructed using molecular and morphological data. Furthermore, the ability of continuous characters derived from geometric morphometric analyses to place fossil taxa with limited discrete characters into a phylogeny with their extant relatives was tested by simulating the inclusion of fossil taxa. This was done by removing the molecular partition of individual extant species to produce a "cladistic pseudofossil" with only the geometric morphometric derived characters coded. The phylogenetic position of each cladistic pseudofossil taxon was then compared with its placement in the total evidence tree and a symmetric resampling tree to evaluate the degree to which morphometric characters alone can correctly place simulated fossil species. In 33-45% of the test cases (depending upon the approach used for measuring success), it was possible to place the pseudofossil taxon into the correct regions of the phylogeny using only the morphometric characters. This suggests that the incorporation of extinct Conus taxa into phylogenetic hypotheses will be possible, permitting a wide range of macroevolutionary questions to be addressed within this genus. This methodology also has potential to contribute to phylogenetic reconstructions for other major components of the fossil record that lack numerous discrete characters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325808     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  10 in total

1.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  A Systematist's Guide to Estimating Bayesian Phylogenies From Morphological Data.

Authors:  April M Wright
Journal:  Insect Syst Divers       Date:  2019-06-18

3.  Genomic repeat abundances contain phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  Steven Dodsworth; Mark W Chase; Laura J Kelly; Ilia J Leitch; Jiří Macas; Petr Novák; Mathieu Piednoël; Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss; Andrew R Leitch
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Glowing seashells: diversity of fossilized coloration patterns on coral reef-associated cone snail (Gastropoda: Conidae) shells from the Neogene of the Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Jonathan R Hendricks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The heritability of shell morphometrics in the freshwater pulmonate gastropod Physa.

Authors:  Robert T Dillon; Stephen J Jacquemin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Monogenean anchor morphometry: systematic value, phylogenetic signal, and evolution.

Authors:  Tsung Fei Khang; Oi Yoon Michelle Soo; Wooi Boon Tan; Lee Hong Susan Lim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Integrative Phylogenetics: Tools for Palaeontologists to Explore the Tree of Life.

Authors:  Raquel López-Antoñanzas; Jonathan Mitchell; Tiago R Simões; Fabien L Condamine; Robin Aguilée; Pablo Peláez-Campomanes; Sabrina Renaud; Jonathan Rolland; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07

8.  An expanded combined evidence approach to the Gavialis problem using geometric morphometric data from crocodylian braincases and Eustachian systems.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Leone Gold; Christopher A Brochu; Mark A Norell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A continuous morphological approach to study the evolution of pollen in a phylogenetic context: An example with the order Myrtales.

Authors:  Ricardo Kriebel; Mohammad Khabbazian; Kenneth J Sytsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differential influences of allometry, phylogeny and environment on the rostral shape diversity of extinct South American notoungulates.

Authors:  Helder Gomes Rodrigues; Raphaël Cornette; Julien Clavel; Guillermo Cassini; Bhart-Anjan S Bhullar; Marcos Fernández-Monescillo; Karen Moreno; Anthony Herrel; Guillaume Billet
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.