Literature DB >> 23325582

Massively parallel tumor multigene sequencing to evaluate response to panitumumab in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Marc Peeters1, Kelly S Oliner, Alex Parker, Salvatore Siena, Eric Van Cutsem, Jing Huang, Yves Humblet, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Thierry André, Jeffrey Wiezorek, David Reese, Scott D Patterson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway mutations predicted response to monotherapy with panitumumab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Using massively parallel multigene sequencing, we analyzed 320 samples for 9 genes, with multigene sequence data from 288 (90%) samples.
RESULTS: Mutation rates were: KRAS (45%), NRAS (5%), BRAF (7%), PIK3CA (9%), PTEN (6%), TP53 (60%), EGFR (1%), AKT1 (<1%), and CTNNB1 (2%). In the randomized study and open-label extension, 22 of 138 (16%) wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients versus 0 of 103 mutant KRAS (codons 12/13) patients had objective responses. Of 6 mutant KRAS (codon 61) patients, 1 with a Q61H mutation achieved partial response during the extension. Among wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients, 0 of 9 patients with NRAS mutations, 0 of 13 with BRAF mutations, 2 of 10 with PIK3CA mutations, 1 of 9 with PTEN mutations, and 1 of 2 with CTNNB1 mutations responded to panitumumab. No patients responded to best supportive care alone. Panitumumab treatment was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) among wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients [HR, 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.56]. Among wild-type KRAS patients, a treatment effect for PFS favoring panitumumab occurred in patients with wild-type NRAS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.56) and wild-type BRAF (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.55) but not mutant NRAS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.44-8.44).
CONCLUSIONS: These results show the feasibility and potential clinical use of next-generation sequencing for evaluating predictive biomarkers. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325582     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  93 in total

1.  How Can Next-Generation Sequencing (Genomics) Help Us in Treating Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 2.  New therapeutic strategies for BRAF mutant colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Ryan B Corcoran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

3.  The S492R EGFR ectodomain mutation is never detected in KRAS wild-type colorectal carcinoma before exposure to EGFR monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Claudia Esposito; Anna Maria Rachiglio; Maria Libera La Porta; Alessandra Sacco; Cristin Roma; Alessia Iannaccone; Fabiana Tatangelo; Laura Forgione; Raffaella Pasquale; Americo Barbaro; Gerardo Botti; Fortunato Ciardiello; Nicola Normanno
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Surgery: Cetuximab--an option for unresectable CRC liver metastases.

Authors:  Pierre Laurent-Puig; Leonor Benhaim
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in personalized gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Helena Verdaguer; Tamara Saurí; Teresa Macarulla
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

6.  Updated guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  P García-Alfonso; J García-Foncillas; R Salazar; P Pérez-Segura; R García-Carbonero; E Musulén-Palet; M Cuatrecasas; S Landolfi; S Ramón Y Cajal; S Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Expanded RAS: refining the patient population.

Authors:  Chloe E Atreya; Ryan B Corcoran; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  High early growth response 1 (EGR1) expression correlates with resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in vitro and with poorer outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  S S Kumar; Y Tomita; J Wrin; M Bruhn; A Swalling; M Mohammed; T J Price; J E Hardingham
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies.

Authors:  Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 10.  First-line chemotherapy for mCRC—a review and evidence-based algorithm.

Authors:  Chiara Cremolini; Marta Schirripa; Carlotta Antoniotti; Roberto Moretto; Lisa Salvatore; Gianluca Masi; Alfredo Falcone; Fotios Loupakis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.