Literature DB >> 23325435

Postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for the prevention of infectious complications associated with tube thoracostomy in patients undergoing elective general thoracic surgery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

David A Oxman1, Nicolas C Issa, Francisco M Marty, Alka Patel, Christia Z Panizales, Nathaniel N Johnson, J Humberto Licona, Shannon S McKenna, Gyorgy Frendl, Steven J Mentzer, Michael T Jaklitsch, Raphael Bueno, Yolonda Colson, Scott J Swanson, David J Sugarbaker, Lindsey R Baden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether extended postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with tube thoracostomy reduces the risk of infectious complications compared with preoperative prophylaxis only.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Brigham and Women's Hospital, an 800-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 251 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring tube thoracostomy between April 2008 and April 2011.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received preoperative antibacterial prophylaxis with cefazolin sodium (or other drug if the patient was allergic to cefazolin). Postoperatively, patients were randomly assigned (at a 1:1 ratio) using a computer-generated randomization sequence to receive extended antibacterial prophylaxis (n = 125) or placebo (n = 126) for 48 hours or until all thoracostomy tubes were removed, whichever came first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The combined occurrence of surgical site infection, empyema, pneumonia, and Clostridium difficile colitis by postoperative day 28.
RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (121 in the intervention group and 124 in the placebo group). Thirteen patients (10.7%) in the intervention group and 8 patients (6.5%) in the placebo group had a primary end point (risk difference, -4.3% [95% CI, -11.3% to 2.7%]; P = .26). Six patients (5.0%) in the intervention group and 5 patients (4.0%) in the placebo group developed surgical site infections (risk difference, -0.93% [95% CI, -6.1% to 4.3%]; P = .77). Seven patients (5.8%) in the intervention group and 3 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group developed pneumonia (risk difference, -3.4% [95% CI, -8.3% to 1.6%]; P = .21). One patient in the intervention group developed empyema. No patients experienced C difficile colitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Extended postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring tube thoracostomy did not reduce the number of infectious complications compared with preoperative prophylaxis only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00818766.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325435     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  7 in total

Review 1.  Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications.

Authors:  Johnathon M Aho; Raaj K Ruparel; Phillip G Rowse; Rushin D Brahmbhatt; Donald Jenkins; Mariela Rivera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  P value interpretations and considerations.

Authors:  Matthew S Thiese; Brenden Ronna; Ulrike Ott
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Peri-Operative Prophylaxis in Patients of Neonatal and Pediatric Age Subjected to Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Authors:  Sonia Bianchini; Laura Nicoletti; Sara Monaco; Erika Rigotti; Agnese Corbelli; Annamaria Colombari; Cinzia Auriti; Caterina Caminiti; Giorgio Conti; Maia De Luca; Daniele Donà; Luisa Galli; Silvia Garazzino; Alessandro Inserra; Stefania La Grutta; Laura Lancella; Mario Lima; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Gloria Pelizzo; Nicola Petrosillo; Giorgio Piacentini; Carlo Pietrasanta; Nicola Principi; Matteo Puntoni; Alessandro Simonini; Simonetta Tesoro; Elisabetta Venturini; Annamaria Staiano; Fabio Caramelli; Gaetano Domenico Gargiulo; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  Decreased duration of intravenous cephalosporins in intensive care unit patients with selective digestive decontamination: a retrospective before-and-after study.

Authors:  Calypso Mathieu; Roberta Abbate; Zoe Meresse; Emmanuelle Hammad; Gary Duclos; François Antonini; Nadim Cassir; Jeroen Schouten; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Marc Leone
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  An innovative oral management procedure to reduce postoperative complications.

Authors:  Akari Kaga; Tetsuya Ikeda; Keisei Tachibana; Ryota Tanaka; Haruhiko Kondo; Takanori Kawabata; Tomoko Yorozu; Koichiro Saito
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  Surgical site infections in a longitudinal cohort of neonatal intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  P A Prasad; J Wong-McLoughlin; S Patel; S E Coffin; T E Zaoutis; J Perlman; P DeLaMora; L Alba; Y-h Ferng; L Saiman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in the ICU: to be or not to be administered for patients undergoing procedures?

Authors:  Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Marc Leone; Sharon Einav
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 17.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.