Literature DB >> 23324959

Preoperative malalignment increases risk of failure after total knee arthroplasty.

Merrill A Ritter1, Kenneth E Davis, Peter Davis, Alex Farris, Robert A Malinzak, Michael E Berend, John B Meding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant survival after total knee arthroplasty has historically been dependent on postoperative knee alignment, although failure may occur when alignment is correct. Preoperative knee alignment has not been thoroughly evaluated as a possible risk factor for implant failure after arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of preoperative knee alignment on implant survival after total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 5342 total knee arthroplasties performed with use of cemented Anatomic Graduated Component implants from 1983 to 2006. Each knee was independently measured preoperatively and postoperatively for overall coronal alignment. Neutral ranges for preoperative and postoperative alignment were defined by means of Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 1.0% (fifty-four of 5342 prostheses); failure was defined as aseptic loosening of the femoral and/or tibial component. The average preoperative anatomical alignment (and standard deviation) was 0.1° ± 7.7° of varus (range, 25° of varus to 35° of valgus), and the average postoperative anatomical alignment (and standard deviation) was 4.7° ± 2.5° of valgus (range, 12° of varus to 20° of valgus). The failure rate in knees in >8° of varus preoperatively (2.2%; p = 0.0005) or >11° of valgus preoperatively (2.4%; p = 0.0081) was elevated when compared with knees in neutral preoperatively (0.71%). Knees with preoperative deformities corrected to postoperative neutral alignment (2.5° through 7.4°) had a lower failure rate (1.9%) than undercorrected or overcorrected knees (3.0%) (p = 0.0103). Knees with postoperative neutral alignment, regardless of preoperative alignment, had a lower failure rate (0.74%) than knees with postoperative alignment of <2.5° or >7.4° of anatomic valgus (1.7%) (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with excessive preoperative alignment (>8° of varus or >11° of valgus) have a greater risk of failure (2.3%). Neutral postoperative alignment (2.5° through 7.4° of valgus) improves (1.9% for preoperatively deformed knees) but does not completely eliminate the risk of failure (0.5% for knees that were neutral both preoperatively and postoperatively). Careful attention should be paid to knee alignment during total knee arthroplasty, especially for patients with severe preoperative deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23324959     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  36 in total

Review 1.  Shorter survival rate in varus-aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-Xiao Liu; Ping Shang; Xiao-Zhou Ying; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Varus-valgus stress radiograph as a predictor for extensive medial release in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Sung Hyun Lee; Tae Yeong Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Clinical faceoff: Neutrally versus kinematically aligned TKA.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Sam Oussedik; Michael B Cross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Stelios Papadopoulos; Kyle Kuznik; Lillian R Ghaly; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty carries a risk of bony gap changes and flexion-extension axis displacement.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Tomoki Sassa; Katsuya Nagai; Kengo Harato; Shu Kobayashi; Taro Yamashita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Satisfactory medium-term outcomes with lateral condylar sliver osteotomy to correct valgus deformity in total knee replacements.

Authors:  Videshnandan Raut; Hosam E Matar; Amit Singh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Risk factors for tibial implant malpositioning in total knee arthrosplasty-consecutive series of one thousand, four hundred and seventeen cases.

Authors:  Romain Gaillard; Simone Cerciello; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Factors affecting the osteolysis around the components after posterior-stabilized total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chang Wan Kim; Seung Suk Seo; Jung Han Kim; Hyeong Joo Lee; Chang Rack Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Should we use hip-ankle radiographs to assess the coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty?].

Authors:  J Dargel; L Pennig; C Schnurr; C K Boese; P Eysel; J Oppermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Federica Rosso; Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.