Literature DB >> 23324738

Auditory and speech performance in deaf children with deaf parents after cochlear implant.

Ga Young Park1, Il Joon Moon, Eun Yeon Kim, Eun-Wook Chung, Yang-Sun Cho, Won-Ho Chung, Sung Hwa Hong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the auditory and speech outcome in deaf children with deaf parents (CDP) after cochlear implantation (CI), emphasizing both the presence of additional caregiver and patients' main communication mode. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Cochlear implant center at a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen CDP and 14 age- and sex-matched deaf children with normal-hearing parents (CNH). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The Korean version of Ling's stage (K-Ling) and Category of Auditory Perception (CAP) were administered to the children to assess the speech production and auditory perception abilities, preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after CI. To elucidate the effects of the additional caregiver and main communication mode of the implanted child, the patients were divided into the following groups: with additional caregiver(s) who have normal hearing (n = 11) versus without additional caregiver (n = 3); sign language plus oral communication (S+O) group (n = 9) versus oral communication only (O) group (n = 5).
RESULTS: CAP scores and K-Ling stages improved remarkably in both CDP and CNH, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Within the CDP group, CAP scores and K-Ling stages improved significantly in CDP with an additional caregiver than those without. Auditory perception and speech production performances in the S+O group were similar to those in the O group.
CONCLUSION: CDP can develop similarly to CNH in auditory perception and speech production, if an additional caregiver with normal hearing provides sufficient support and speech input. In addition, using sign language in addition to oral language might not be harmful, and these children can be a communication bridge between their deaf parents and society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23324738     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827b4d26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

1.  The value of Gesell score in predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation in children.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Liu Haihong; Zheng Jun; Chen Min; Li Ying; Hao Jinsheng; Liu Wei; Zhang Jie; Ni Xin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hearables as a Gateway to Hearing Health Care.

Authors:  Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.340

3.  Mimic Cochlear Implant Surgery-Induced Cochlear Infection Fails to Further Damage Auditory Pathway in Deafened Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Zhao Han; Chengjin Wang; Yuyan Gu; Ning Cong; Rui Ma; Fanglu Chi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.