Michael Endermann1. 1. von Bodelschwinghsche Stiftungen Bethel, Psychosozialer Dienst Bethel.regional, Remterweg 58, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany. michael.endermann@bethel.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and global quality of life (QOL) among young adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy and mild intellectual disability. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two persons with epilepsy and cognitive problems were routinely screened on HRQOL, global QOL, and psychological distress four weeks after admission to a time-limited residential rehabilitation unit. The PESOS scales (PE = PErformance, SO = SOciodemographic aspects, S = Subjective evaluation/estimation) on epilepsy-specific problems were administered as measures of HRQOL; a questionnaire on life satisfaction and an item on overall QOL were used as measures of global QOL. Psychological distress was captured with the Symptom Checklist 90-R. Further data were gained from medical files. Quality-of- life predictors were identified using univariate methods and stepwise regression analyses. RESULTS: Psychological distress was the only predictor of all HRQOL and global QOL parameters. Seizure frequency was a predictor of most HRQOL variables. Other epilepsy variables affected only some HRQOL variables but were not associated with global QOL. Health-related quality of life did not seem to be strongly impaired. Only low correlations were found between HRQOL and global QOL. CONCLUSION: The notion of psychological distress as the most influential predictor of all QOL measures is in line with most findings on QOL in epilepsy. Former observations of weak associations between HRQOL and global QOL among patients with epilepsy and mild intellectual disability are supported. Thus, interventions to reduce psychological distress, besides epilepsy treatment, seem to be of great importance to improve QOL.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and global quality of life (QOL) among young adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy and mild intellectual disability. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two persons with epilepsy and cognitive problems were routinely screened on HRQOL, global QOL, and psychological distress four weeks after admission to a time-limited residential rehabilitation unit. The PESOS scales (PE = PErformance, SO = SOciodemographic aspects, S = Subjective evaluation/estimation) on epilepsy-specific problems were administered as measures of HRQOL; a questionnaire on life satisfaction and an item on overall QOL were used as measures of global QOL. Psychological distress was captured with the Symptom Checklist 90-R. Further data were gained from medical files. Quality-of- life predictors were identified using univariate methods and stepwise regression analyses. RESULTS: Psychological distress was the only predictor of all HRQOL and global QOL parameters. Seizure frequency was a predictor of most HRQOL variables. Other epilepsy variables affected only some HRQOL variables but were not associated with global QOL. Health-related quality of life did not seem to be strongly impaired. Only low correlations were found between HRQOL and global QOL. CONCLUSION: The notion of psychological distress as the most influential predictor of all QOL measures is in line with most findings on QOL in epilepsy. Former observations of weak associations between HRQOL and global QOL among patients with epilepsy and mild intellectual disability are supported. Thus, interventions to reduce psychological distress, besides epilepsy treatment, seem to be of great importance to improve QOL.