| Literature DB >> 23324314 |
Elizabeth Greally1, Benjamin J Davison, Alison Blain, Steve Laval, Andrew Blamire, Volker Straub, Guy A MacGowan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manganese-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MECMR) can non-invasively assess myocardial calcium influx, and calcium levels are known to be elevated in muscular dystrophy cardiomyopathy based on cellular studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23324314 PMCID: PMC3564732 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Figure 1Representative figure showing single example of manganese contrast enhancement experiment, with superimposed images showing clear increase in myocardial contrast following manganese infusion.
Haemodynamics in young and older mice
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 13 | |
| 33.3±0.9* | 35.8±1.0** | 28.8±1.0 | 40.5±1.2** | 37.1±1.1 | 32.9±0.9 | |
| 390±13** | 419±14 | 480±14 | 384±16** | 427±15 | 483±12 | |
| 3.03±0.12 | 3.57±0.13 | 3.58±0.13 | 2.80±0.14** | 3.56±0.13+ | 3.86±0.11 | |
| 1.97±0.11 | 1.72±0.11 | 2.06±0.11 | 1.93±0.14 | 1.78±0.12 | 1.94±0.10 | |
| 0.70±0.07 | 0.68±0.08 | 0.67±0.08 | 0.72±0.09 | 0.74±0.08 | 0.69±0.07 | |
| 1.28±0.06 | 1.03±0.06**/† | 1.38±0.06 | 1.21±0.07 | 1.04±0.06† | 1.25±0.05 | |
| 65±2 | 61±2†† | 68±2 | 63±3 | 60±2†† | 65±2 | |
| 0.50±0.03** | 0.43±0.03** | 0.67±0.03 | 0.46±0.03# | 0.44±0.03** | 0.60±0.03 | |
LV: left ventricle; EDV: end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume.
*P<0.01 vs older WT.
**P<0.01 vs Sgcd−/− within same age group.
+P<0.05 vs WT within same age group.
#P=0.06 vs Sgcd−/− within same age group.
†P<0.01 ANOVA vs WT and Sgcd−/− both ages combined.
††P<0.05 ANOVA vs Sgcd−/− both ages combined.
Figure 2Effects of Ageing on Manganese Contrast Enhancement. Manganese contrast enhancement in older mice (A) and young mice (B). The kinetics of manganese contrast enhancement are slower in the older mice compared to younger mice (P<0.05 repeated measures ANOVA). C. Mid point contrast enhancement in older and younger mice. There was a borderline increase in contrast enhancement in the older Sgcd−/− mice (#P=0.07 versus WT) and in the younger mice contrast enhancement was significantly elevated in both Sgcd−/− and mdx mice (+P<0.05 versus WT). For the younger mice N as are in Table 1, in the older mice WT N = 9, mdx N = 10, and Sgcd−/− mice N = 15 (as some older mice did not have functional data).
Figure 3Effects of L-type Calcium Channel Blocker Diltiazem on Manganese Contrast Enhancement. A. Mid point contrast enhancement in younger mice with no pharmacological treatment (left column), showing significant higher levels of mid point contrast enhancement in mdx and Sgcd−/− vs WT mice (+P<0.05 versus WT, as in Figure 2C). Diltiazem 5 mg produced significant reductions in contrast enhancement in mdx (N=7) and WT (N=6) versus no treatment, though not for the Sgcd−/− mice (N=6). Diltiazem 10 mg produced a significant reduction in contrast enhancement in the Sgcd−/− mice (N=9); (+P<0.05 versus WT; *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus untreated, within same strain). B. Effects of diltiazem on heart rates. Diltiazem (5 mg) significantly reduced heart rates in WT and in mdx mice, though not in Sgcd−/− mice, a similar effect as seen with manganese contrast enhancement. Higher doses of diltiazem (10 mg) significantly reduced heart rates in the Sgcd−/− mice. (*P<0.05 versus without diltiazem).
Figure 4Effect of Heart Rate Reduction on Manganese Contrast Enhancement. A and B. The HCN channel inhibitor ZD 7288 significantly reduced mid point contrast enhancement in all mouse groups (**P<0.01 versus without ZD 7288), and this was accompanied by significant reductions in heart rate also in all groups (**P<0.01 versus heart rate pre ZD 7288) (WT N = 8, mdx N = 9, Sgcd−/− N = 10). C and D. When the time course of manganese contrast enhancement and heart rate in the wild type and Sgcd−/− mice is examined we can see that the ZD 7288 reduces heart rate in the Sgcd−/− mice to the same level as wild type mice from the time of starting the manganese infusion, though during the first 5 minutes there is still a significantly higher level of manganese contrast enhancement in the Sgcd−/− mice compared to WT (**P<0.01). This indicates that whereas heart rate is an important factor in the extent of manganese contrast enhancement, in the Sgcd−/− mice there is at least some component of increased cellular uptake of manganese per heart beat compared to WT.