Literature DB >> 23323699

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): where are we going? A bibliometric assessment.

Riccardo Autorino1, Rachid Yakoubi, Wesley M White, Matthew Gettman, Marco De Sio, Carmelo Quattrone, Carmine Di Palma, Alessandro Izzo, Jeorge Correia-Pinto, Jihad H Kaouk, Estevão Lima.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-related publications over the last 5 years. A systematic literature search was done to retrieve publications related to NOTES from 2006 to 2011. The following variables were recorded: year of publication; article type; study design; setting; Journal Citation Reports® journal category; authors area of surgical speciality; geographic area of origin; surgical procedure; NOTES technique; NOTES access route; number of clinical cases. A time-trend analysis was performed by comparing early (2006-2008) and late (2009-2011) study periods. Overall, 644 publications were included in the analysis and most papers were found in general surgery journals (50.9%). Studies were most frequently clinical series (43.9%) and animal experimental (48%), with the articles focusing primarily on cholecystectomy, access creation and closure, and peritoneoscopy. Pure NOTES techniques were performed in most of the published reports (85%) with the remaining cases being hybrid NOTES (7.4%) and NOTES-assisted procedures (6.1%). The access routes included transgastric (52.5%), transcolonic (12.3%), transvesical (12.5%), transvaginal (10.5%), and combined (12.3%). From the early to the late period, there was a significant increase in the number of randomised controlled trials (5.6% vs 7.2%) or non-randomised but comparative studies (5.6% vs 22.9%) (P < 0.001) and there was also a significant increase in the number of colorectal procedures and nephrectomies (P = 0.002). Pure NOTES remained the most studied approach over the years but with increased investigation in the field of NOTES-assisted techniques (P = 0.001). There was also a significant increase in the adoption of transvesical access (7% vs 15.6%) (P = 0.007). NOTES is in a developmental stage and much work is still needed to refine techniques, verify safety and document efficacy. Since the first description of the concept of NOTES, >2000 clinical cases, irrespective of specialty, have been reported. NOTES remains a field of intense clinical and experimental research in various surgical specialities.
© 2012 The Authors BJU International © 2012 BJU International.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23323699     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11494.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Oktay Akça; Homayoun Zargar; Riccardo Autorino; Luis Felipe Brandao; Ahmet Selçuk Gürler; Abdullah Avşar; Rahim Horuz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Current evidence in gastrointestinal surgery: natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Germany: Data from the German NOTES registry].

Authors:  K S Lehmann; C Zornig; G Arlt; M Butters; D R Bulian; R Manger; J Burghardt; N Runkel; A Pürschel; J Köninger; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Novel and safer endoscopic cholecystectomy using only a flexible endoscope via single port.

Authors:  Hirohito Mori; Nobuya Kobayashi; Hideki Kobara; Noriko Nishiyama; Shintaro Fujihara; Taiga Chiyo; Maki Ayaki; Takashi Nagase; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Single-Incision and Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Switzerland.

Authors:  Daniel C Steinemann; Andreas Zerz; Michel Adamina; Walter Brunner; Andreas Keerl; Antonio Nocito; Andreas Scheiwiller; Rene Spalinger; Stephan A Vorburger; Sebastian H Lamm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Transvaginal organ extraction: potential for broad clinical application.

Authors:  Garth R Jacobsen; Juan S Barajas-Gamboa; Alisa M Coker; Joslin Cheverie; C Aitor Macias; Bryan J Sandler; Mark A Talamini; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Potential benefits of single-port compared to multiport laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  H Tran; I Turingan; K Tran; M Zajkowska; V Lam; W Hawthorne
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Sergio Ibarra; Eric M Haas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Evaluation of hands-on seminar for reduced port surgery using fresh porcine cadaver model.

Authors:  Saseem Poudel; Yo Kurashima; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Shuji Kitashiro; Eiji Kanehira; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.