Literature DB >> 23323660

The impact of learning environment disruption on medical student performance.

Tim J Wilkinson1, Anthony N Ali, Caroline J Bell, Frances A Carter, Chris M Frampton, Jan M McKenzie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the effects of two distinct and separate disruptions caused by earthquakes to a medical school learning environment on two separate cohorts of Year 5 medical students.
METHODS: The first disruption was caused by an earthquake of magnitude 7.1 that occurred near the end of the academic year but caused minimal physical damage. The second disruption, to a different cohort of students, was caused by a magnitude 6.3 aftershock that occurred at the beginning of the academic year, caused loss of life and widespread damage to the city, and resulted in the closure of the medical school building for 2 years. Using students from the same class, who spent their year in different unaffected cities, as control subjects, and students from previous years in the same city as historic controls, we developed models to compare actual and predicted performances on end-of-year examinations in each of the two cohorts with those in the three previous unaffected year groups.
RESULTS: The predictive models fitted the data well with multiple correlations for the written (R range: 0.69-0.79) and clinical (R range: 0.52-0.69) examinations. Students in the first cohort, for whom the disruption occurred close to end-of-year examinations but had a mild effect on the physical environment, performed slightly (-1.5% to -2.0%) but significantly (p < 0.05) worse than predicted for all three outcomes. Students in the second cohort, who experienced major disruption of their physical environment, performed as expected.
CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected disruption that occurred close to examinations, but which had less physical environmental effect, had a greater impact on assessment performance than a more severe disruption and series of disruptions to which students had time to adapt and which they could work around. Two theories are offered to explain the observations. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23323660     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  Impact of the Texas-Wide Premedical Mentoring Program during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nicole L Alexander; Jessica C Sheu; Alexandra M Villagran; Christi J Guerrini; Eric A Storch
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Rapid transition to online teaching program during COVID-19 lockdown: Experience from a medical college of India.

Authors:  Amir Maroof Khan; Somdatta Patra; Piyush Gupta; Arun Kumar Sharma; Anil K Jain
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  Design of Mobile Augmented Reality in Health Care Education: A Theory-Driven Framework.

Authors:  Egui Zhu; Anneliese Lilienthal; Lauren Aquino Shluzas; Italo Masiello; Nabil Zary
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-18

4.  A descriptive pilot study of the immediate impacts of COVID-19 on dental and dental hygiene students' readiness and wellness.

Authors:  Aderonke A Akinkugbe; Dina T Garcia; Carlos S Smith; Tegwyn H Brickhouse; Maghboeba Mosavel
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Identifying medical students at risk of underperformance from significant stressors.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Jan M McKenzie; Anthony N Ali; Joy Rudland; Frances A Carter; Caroline J Bell
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.