BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Over the last two decades (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT, has been used to discriminate neurodegenerative Parkinsonian syndrome from other diseases. BasGan is a freely available software that assists (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT evaluation by estimating semiquantitative values for each basal nucleus and compares the results to a database of healthy subjects. The aims of this study were: (1) to assess the accuracy of qualitative analysis and of semiquantitative, BasGan-assisted evaluations of (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT; (2) to compare the accuracy of both methods when applied to "doubtful" cases; (3) to appreciate the reproducibility of the BasGan-assisted evaluations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were included in this 4-year follow-up study. The diagnostic cut-off for semiquantitative uptake values of each basal nucleus was determined based on ROC curves analysis. Accuracy scores were calculated for the entire population and for "doubtful" cases. Intra- and interoperator reproducibility was assessed. RESULTS: Accuracy of the software-assisted analyses was high for data from each nucleus. In "doubtful" exams accuracy was higher when using BasGan as opposed to relying solely on visual assessment. Intra- and interoperator reproducibility of the BasGan-assisted evaluations was good to excellent. CONCLUSION: BasGan-assisted evaluations of (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT were very useful, particularly in "doubtful" cases. Multicenter studies are mandatory before routine use of BasGan.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Over the last two decades (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT, has been used to discriminate neurodegenerative Parkinsonian syndrome from other diseases. BasGan is a freely available software that assists (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT evaluation by estimating semiquantitative values for each basal nucleus and compares the results to a database of healthy subjects. The aims of this study were: (1) to assess the accuracy of qualitative analysis and of semiquantitative, BasGan-assisted evaluations of (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT; (2) to compare the accuracy of both methods when applied to "doubtful" cases; (3) to appreciate the reproducibility of the BasGan-assisted evaluations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were included in this 4-year follow-up study. The diagnostic cut-off for semiquantitative uptake values of each basal nucleus was determined based on ROC curves analysis. Accuracy scores were calculated for the entire population and for "doubtful" cases. Intra- and interoperator reproducibility was assessed. RESULTS: Accuracy of the software-assisted analyses was high for data from each nucleus. In "doubtful" exams accuracy was higher when using BasGan as opposed to relying solely on visual assessment. Intra- and interoperator reproducibility of the BasGan-assisted evaluations was good to excellent. CONCLUSION:BasGan-assisted evaluations of (123) I-FP-CIT-SPECT were very useful, particularly in "doubtful" cases. Multicenter studies are mandatory before routine use of BasGan.
Authors: Sule Tinaz; Christopher Chow; Phillip H Kuo; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Hal Blumenfeld; Elan D Louis; George Zubal Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Helen Schmitz-Steinkrüger; Catharina Lange; Ivayla Apostolova; Franziska L Mathies; Lars Frings; Susanne Klutmann; Sabine Hellwig; Philipp T Meyer; Ralph Buchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jonathan Christopher Taylor; Charles Romanowski; Eleanor Lorenz; Christine Lo; Oliver Bandmann; John Fenner Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.138