Literature DB >> 23323156

Multimodality imaging of tumor and bone response in a mouse model of bony metastasis.

Benjamin A Hoff1, Komal Chughtai, Yong Hyun Jeon, Kenneth Kozloff, Stefanie Galbán, Alnawaz Rehemtulla, Brian D Ross, Craig J Galbán.   

Abstract

Cancer drug development generally performs in vivo evaluation of treatment effects that have traditionally relied on detection of morphologic changes. The emergence of new targeted therapies, which may not result in gross morphologic changes, has spurred investigation into more specific imaging methods to quantify response, such as targeted fluorescent probes and bioluminescent cells. The present study investigated tissue response to docetaxel or zoledronic acid (ZA) in a mouse model of bony metastasis. Intratibial implantations of breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) were monitored throughout this study using several modalities: molecular resonance imaging (MRI) tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), micro-computed tomography (µCT) bone volume, bioluminescence imaging (BLI) reporting cancer cell apoptosis, and fluorescence using Osteosense 800 and CatK 680-FAST. Docetaxel treatment resulted in tumor cell kill reflected by ADC and BLI increases and tumor volume reduction, with delayed bone recovery seen in µCT prefaced by increased osteoblastic activity (Osteosense 800). In contrast, the ZA treatment group produced similar values in MRI, BLI, and Osteosense 800 fluorescence imaging readouts when compared to controls. However, µCT bone volume increased significantly by the first week post-treatment and the CatK 680-FAST signal was slightly diminished by 4 weeks following ZA treatment. Multimodality imaging provides a more comprehensive tool for new drug evaluation and efficacy screening through identification of morphology as well as function and apoptotic signaling.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23323156      PMCID: PMC3542837          DOI: 10.1593/tlo.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


  31 in total

Review 1.  Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Applications of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 3.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Molecular imaging of Akt kinase activity.

Authors:  Limin Zhang; Kuei C Lee; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Amjad P Khan; Alla Shilman; Eric C Holland; Brian D Ross; Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  The bone remodeling environment is a factor in breast cancer bone metastasis.

Authors:  Li Laine Ooi; Yu Zheng; Kellie Stalgis-Bilinski; Colin R Dunstan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Review of the contemporary cytotoxic and biologic combinations available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Katherine H Rak Tkaczuk
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 7.  Diffusion imaging for evaluation of tumor therapies in preclinical animal models.

Authors:  B A Moffat; D E Hall; J Stojanovska; P J McConville; J B Moody; T L Chenevert; A Rehemtulla; B D Ross
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis.

Authors:  Johanna A Joyce; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Human breast adenocarcinoma (MDA-231) and human lung squamous cell carcinoma (Hara) do not have the ability to cause bone resorption by themselves during the establishment of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Amy Tomita; Tatsuhiko Kasaoka; Takashi Inui; Minako Toyoshima; Hiroko Nishiyama; Hiromasa Saiki; Haruo Iguchi; Motowo Nakajima
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Hypoxia and TGF-beta drive breast cancer bone metastases through parallel signaling pathways in tumor cells and the bone microenvironment.

Authors:  Lauren K Dunn; Khalid S Mohammad; Pierrick G J Fournier; C Ryan McKenna; Holly W Davis; Maria Niewolna; Xiang Hong Peng; John M Chirgwin; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Intratibial injection of patient-derived tumor cells from giant cell tumor of bone elicits osteolytic reaction in nude mouse.

Authors:  Leqin Xu; Zhipeng Wu; Zhenhua Zhou; Xinghai Yang; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Real-time detection of CTL function reveals distinct patterns of caspase activation mediated by Fas versus granzyme B.

Authors:  Jinzhu Li; Sarah K Figueira; Alexandra C A Vrazo; Brock F Binkowski; Braeden L Butler; Yasuhiro Tabata; Alexandra Filipovich; Michael B Jordan; Kimberly A Risma
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  In vivo fluorescence reflectance imaging of protease activity in a mouse model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P B Satkunananthan; M J Anderson; N M De Jesus; D R Haudenschild; C M Ripplinger; B A Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Live cell evaluation of granzyme delivery and death receptor signaling in tumor cells targeted by human natural killer cells.

Authors:  Alexandra C Vrazo; Adrianne E Hontz; Sarah K Figueira; Braeden L Butler; Julie M Ferrell; Brock F Binkowski; Jinzhu Li; Kimberly A Risma
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Multimodal imaging provides insight into targeted therapy response in metastatic prostate cancer to the bone.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hoff; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian Van Dort; David C Smith; Zachery R Reichert; Jon A Jacobson; Gary D Luker; Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-05

6.  Imaging of Orthotopic Glioblastoma Xenografts in Mice Using a Clinical CT Scanner: Comparison with Micro-CT and Histology.

Authors:  Stefanie Kirschner; Bettina Mürle; Manuela Felix; Anna Arns; Christoph Groden; Frederik Wenz; Andreas Hug; Gerhard Glatting; Martin Kramer; Frank A Giordano; Marc A Brockmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Bone imaging in prostate cancer: the evolving roles of nuclear medicine and radiology.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Gurdip Azad; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2016-07-20

8.  Longitudinal imaging of cancer cell metastases in two preclinical models: a correlation of noninvasive imaging to histopathology.

Authors:  Pavan P Adiseshaiah; Nimit L Patel; Lilia V Ileva; Joseph D Kalen; Diana C Haines; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.