AIM: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of clevudine compared with entecavir in antiviral-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of CHB patients treated with clevudine 30 mg/d and compared their clinical outcomes with patients treated with entecavir 0.5 mg/d. The biochemical response, as assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, virologic response, as assessed by serum hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) titer, serologic response, as assessed by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, and virologic breakthrough with genotypic mutations were assessed. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-four patients [clevudine (n = 118) vs entecavir (n = 136)] were enrolled. In clevudine-treated patients, the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 83.9% at week 48 and 91.5% at week 96 (80.9% and 91.2% in the entecavir group, respectively), the mean titer changes in serum HBV DNA were -6.03 and -6.55 log(10) copies/mL (-6.35 and -6.86 log(10) copies/mL, respectively, in the entecavir group), and the cumulative non-detection rates of serum HBV DNA were 72.6% and 83.1% (74.4% and 83.8%, respectively, in the entecavir group). These results were similar to those of entecavir-treated patients. The cumulative rates of HBeAg seroconversion were 21.8% at week 48 and 25.0% at week 96 in patients treated with clevudine, which was similar to patients treated with entecavir (22.8% and 27.7%, respectively). The virologic breakthrough in the clevudine group occurred in 9 (7.6%) patients at weeks 48 and 15 (12.7%) patients at week 96, which primarily corresponded to genotypic mutations of rtM204I and/or rtL180M. There was no virologic breakthrough in the entecavir group. CONCLUSION: In antiviral-naive CHB patients, long-term treatment outcomes of clevudine were not inferior to those of entecavir, except for virologic breakthrough.
AIM: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of clevudine compared with entecavir in antiviral-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of CHB patients treated with clevudine 30 mg/d and compared their clinical outcomes with patients treated with entecavir 0.5 mg/d. The biochemical response, as assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, virologic response, as assessed by serum hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) titer, serologic response, as assessed by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, and virologic breakthrough with genotypic mutations were assessed. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-four patients [clevudine (n = 118) vs entecavir (n = 136)] were enrolled. In clevudine-treated patients, the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 83.9% at week 48 and 91.5% at week 96 (80.9% and 91.2% in the entecavir group, respectively), the mean titer changes in serum HBV DNA were -6.03 and -6.55 log(10) copies/mL (-6.35 and -6.86 log(10) copies/mL, respectively, in the entecavir group), and the cumulative non-detection rates of serum HBV DNA were 72.6% and 83.1% (74.4% and 83.8%, respectively, in the entecavir group). These results were similar to those of entecavir-treated patients. The cumulative rates of HBeAg seroconversion were 21.8% at week 48 and 25.0% at week 96 in patients treated with clevudine, which was similar to patients treated with entecavir (22.8% and 27.7%, respectively). The virologic breakthrough in the clevudine group occurred in 9 (7.6%) patients at weeks 48 and 15 (12.7%) patients at week 96, which primarily corresponded to genotypic mutations of rtM204I and/or rtL180M. There was no virologic breakthrough in the entecavir group. CONCLUSION: In antiviral-naive CHB patients, long-term treatment outcomes of clevudine were not inferior to those of entecavir, except for virologic breakthrough.
Authors: J H Kim; H J Yim; E S Jung; Y K Jung; J H Kim; Y S Seo; J E Yeon; H S Lee; S H Um; K S Byun Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Won Young Tak; Soo Young Park; Chang Min Cho; Min Kyu Jung; Seong Woo Jeon; Young Oh Kweon; Ji Young Park; Yoon Kyung Sohn Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2010-04-18 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Byung Kook Kim; Jeeyoung Oh; So Young Kwon; Won Hyeok Choe; Soon Young Ko; Kyoung Hoon Rhee; Tae Ho Seo; So Dug Lim; Chang Hong Lee Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2009-05-28 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Jung Im Seok; Dong Kuck Lee; Chang Hyeong Lee; Min Su Park; Sun Young Kim; Hyang-Sook Kim; Hee-Young Jo; Chang Hun Lee; Dae-Seong Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Suk Bae Kim; Won Kyung Lee; Hoon Choi; So Mi Kim; Rhan Noh; Ha Yan Kang; Sang Suk Lee; Sung Soo Ra; Jae Hwan Gong; Hyun Duk Shin Journal: Korean J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-06
Authors: Won Young Tak; Jin Mo Yang; Byung Ik Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Gab Jin Cheon; Kwan Soo Byun; Do Young Kim; Byung Chul Yoo Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2014-05-25 Impact factor: 6.047