Literature DB >> 23322841

Medical imaging displays and their use in image interpretation.

George C Kagadis1, Alisa Walz-Flannigan, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Paul G Nagy, Konstantinos Katsanos, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Steve G Langer.   

Abstract

The adequate and repeatable performance of the image display system is a key element of information technology platforms in a modern radiology department. However, despite the wide availability of high-end computing platforms and advanced color and gray-scale monitors, the quality and properties of the final displayed medical image may often be inadequate for diagnostic purposes if the displays are not configured and maintained properly. In this article-an expanded version of the Radiological Society of North America educational module "Image Display"-the authors discuss fundamentals of image display hardware, quality control and quality assurance processes for optimal image interpretation settings, and parameters of the viewing environment that influence reader performance. Radiologists, medical physicists, and other allied professionals should strive to understand the role of display technology and proper usage for a quality radiology practice. The display settings and display quality control and quality assurance processes described in this article can help ensure high standards of perceived image quality and image interpretation accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322841     DOI: 10.1148/rg.331125096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of grayscale and color-scale renderings of digital medical images for diagnostic interpretation.

Authors:  Akio Ogura; Aoi Kamakura; Youhei Kaneko; Tomoya Kitaoka; Norio Hayashi; Anna Taniguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-03-27

2.  Comparison of medical-grade and calibrated consumer-grade displays for diagnosis of subtle bone fissures.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jonas Welter; Tilman Emrich; Florian Jungmann; Evelyn Dappa; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Visual Search Efficiency: Single 8 MP vs. Dual 5 MP Displays.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  TSR guidelines for the practice of teleradiology: 2021 update.

Authors:  Mustafa N Özmen; Oğuz Dicle; Utku Şenol; Üstün Aydıngöz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  A method for evaluating luminance non-uniformity of displays by use of a commercially available digital camera.

Authors:  Keishin Kawamoto; Shogo Tokurei; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-16

7.  A Systematic Approach of Data Collection and Analysis in Medical Imaging Research.

Authors:  Manjunath K N; Chitra Manuel; Govardhan Hegde; Anjali Kulkarni; Rajendra Kurady; Manuel K
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 8.  Display Characteristics and Their Impact on Digital Pathology: A Current Review of Pathologists' Future "Microscope".

Authors:  Jacob T Abel; Peter Ouillette; Christopher L Williams; John Blau; Jerome Cheng; Keluo Yao; Winston Y Lee; Toby C Cornish; Ulysses G J Balis; David S McClintock
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-08-11

9.  A quantitative validation of segmented colon in virtual colonoscopy using image moments.

Authors:  K N Manjunath; G K Prabhu; P C Siddalingaswamy
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.