Celal Çinar1, İsmail Oran, Halil Bozkaya, Erkin Ozgiray. 1. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey. celalcinar@hotmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The current literature describing surgical and endovascular interventions in blister-like aneurysms (BAs) offers no clear consensus on the optimal treatment modality. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and angiographic features of ruptured BAs treated endovascularly using predominantly flow-diversion strategy. METHODS: The initial clinical and radiological findings, endovascular treatment results, clinical outcomes, and follow-up angiographic findings of seven BAs (one man and six women; mean age, 44.5 years; range, 33-50 years) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: All seven BAs were located in the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Two patients were managed initially by other endovascular treatment options, after that flow-diverting strategy became intention to treat in these two and the remaining five patients. Flow-diverting treatment with pipeline stent (Covidien/Ev3) could be accomplished in all but one patient who was treated by parent artery occlusion due to an access problem. Dual antiaggregant loading was performed 6-8 h before treatment in all patients. No re-bleeding or thrombotic complication occurred periprocedurally. Long-term control angiography was available in all patients revealing occluded aneurysm. The clinical outcome (mRS) was good in five and moderate in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular reconstructive treatment of a ruptured BA using a flow-diverting device is a promising strategy that can be performed with acceptable clinical and good radiological results.
INTRODUCTION: The current literature describing surgical and endovascular interventions in blister-like aneurysms (BAs) offers no clear consensus on the optimal treatment modality. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and angiographic features of ruptured BAs treated endovascularly using predominantly flow-diversion strategy. METHODS: The initial clinical and radiological findings, endovascular treatment results, clinical outcomes, and follow-up angiographic findings of seven BAs (one man and six women; mean age, 44.5 years; range, 33-50 years) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: All seven BAs were located in the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Two patients were managed initially by other endovascular treatment options, after that flow-diverting strategy became intention to treat in these two and the remaining five patients. Flow-diverting treatment with pipeline stent (Covidien/Ev3) could be accomplished in all but one patient who was treated by parent artery occlusion due to an access problem. Dual antiaggregant loading was performed 6-8 h before treatment in all patients. No re-bleeding or thrombotic complication occurred periprocedurally. Long-term control angiography was available in all patients revealing occluded aneurysm. The clinical outcome (mRS) was good in five and moderate in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular reconstructive treatment of a ruptured BA using a flow-diverting device is a promising strategy that can be performed with acceptable clinical and good radiological results.
Authors: S Meckel; T P Singh; P Undrén; B Ramgren; O G Nilsson; C Phatouros; W McAuliffe; M Cronqvist Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Byung-Hee Lee; Byung Moon Kim; Moon Sun Park; Sung Il Park; Eun Chul Chung; Sang Hyun Suh; Chun Sik Choi; Yu Sam Won; In Kyu Yu Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: S I Park; B M Kim; D I Kim; Y S Shin; S H Suh; E C Chung; S Y Kim; S H Kim; Y S Won Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rabih Aboukais; Marie Charlotte Tétard; Antoine Devalckeneer; Pierre Boussemart; Philippe Bourgeois; Nicolas Bricout; Barbara Verbraeken; Tomas Menovsky; Xavier Leclerc; Jean-Paul Lejeune Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Ajit S Puri; Francesco Massari; Takumi Asai; Miklos Marosfoi; Peter Kan; Samuel Y Hou; Mary Howk; Mary Perras; Christopher Brooks; Frederic Clarencon; Matthew J Gounis; Ajay K Wakhloo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Josser E Delgado Almandoz; Yasha Kayan; Andrea Tenreiro; Adam N Wallace; Jill M Scholz; Jennifer L Fease; Anna M Milner; Maximilian Mulder; Kyle M Uittenbogaard; Oscar Tenreiro-Picón Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Antti Lindgren; Mervyn DI Vergouwen; Irene van der Schaaf; Ale Algra; Marieke Wermer; Mike J Clarke; Gabriel Je Rinkel Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-15
Authors: A Scerrati; J Visani; M E Flacco; L Ricciardi; S Trungu; A Raco; F Dones; P De Bonis; C L Sturiale Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mehdi Abbasi; Luis E Savasatano; Waleed Brinjikji; Kevin M Kallmes; Nick Mikoff; Natalie Reierson; Mohamed Abdelmegeed; John Pederson; Beth Warren; Jillienne C Touchette; Sarah Khan; Shelby Kamrowski; Averi Barrett; David F Kallmes; Ramanathan Kadirvel Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 1.764