Literature DB >> 23322064

Significant benefit for older patients after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a long-term follow-up study.

Peter Biberthaler1, Marc Beirer, Sonja Kirchhoff, Volker Braunstein, Ernst Wiedemann, Chlodwig Kirchhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from isolated subacromial impingement (SI) of their shoulder but who are resistant to other therapies benefit substantially from arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) if they are young (<60 years). Although physical demands rise notably in the older population, it still remains unclear if surgery leads to better results in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to focus on the impact of age on the functional outcome in elderly patients suffering from SI.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 307 patients (age range: 42-63 years) with isolated SI were enrolled. The 165 patients were allocated to physical therapy whereas 142 underwent ASD. The patient cohort was divided into two groups according to the median age (<57 years). Functional outcome was recorded using the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) allowing for qualitative self -assessment of the Constant, SPADI and Dark Scores.
RESULTS: Median age was 57 (25%-75%: 48-63) years, follow-up was 55 (25%-75%: 25-87) months. In group I (age < 57 years, n = 165) no significant differences in outcome between physical therapy and ASD were detected. In contrast, in group II (age > 57 years; n = 142) the patients reported significantly better results after ASD in the overall MSQs.
CONCLUSION: Despite their higher age, elderly patients with isolated SI actually benefit significantly from ASD in comparison to physical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322064      PMCID: PMC3580099          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1760-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: outcome comparison between outpatient and hospitalized patients with 2- to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  S Järvelä; T Järvelä; H Aho; I Kiviranta
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.360

2.  Arthroscopic decompression and physiotherapy have similar effectiveness for subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Jonathan Braman; Evan Flatow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Fewer rotator cuff tears fifteen years after arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

Authors:  Hanna Björnsson; Rolf Norlin; Anders Knutsson; Lars Adolfsson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Ketola; J Lehtinen; I Arnala; M Nissinen; H Westenius; H Sintonen; P Aronen; Y T Konttinen; A Malmivaara; T Rousi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-10

5.  THE PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATED WITH RUPTURE OF THE SUPRASPINATUS TENDON.

Authors:  E A Codman; I B Akerson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1931-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Arthroscopic acromioplasty: a comparison between workers' compensation and non-workers' compensation populations.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral.

Authors:  L Linsell; J Dawson; K Zondervan; P Rose; T Randall; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 9.  Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review.

Authors:  Oscar Dorrestijn; Martin Stevens; Jan C Winters; Klaas van der Meer; Ron L Diercks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Long-term patient satisfaction and functional outcome 8-11 years after subacromial decompression.

Authors:  Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg; Ulla Svantesson; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of open acromioplasty, arthroscopic acromioplasty and physiotherapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Stefanos Farfaras; Ninni Sernert; Erling Hallström; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.

Authors:  Amy R Watts; Ben Williams; Susan W Kim; Donald C Bramwell; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-20

Review 3.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression].

Authors:  S Lerch; S Elki; M Jaeger; T Berndt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  [Importance of self-assessment in functional evaluation of trauma patients].

Authors:  M Beirer; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Clinical and radiological outcome following treatment of displaced lateral clavicle fractures using a locking compression plate with lateral extension: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Sebastian Siebenlist; Moritz Crönlein; Lukas Postl; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression in the Treatment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Prospective Study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Khairul Nizam Siron; Muhamad Taufik Mat Lani; Chooi Leng Low; Ren Yi Kow
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-04

Review 7.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

8.  Additional calcar support using a blade device reduces secondary varus displacement following reconstruction of the proximal humerus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Moritz Crönlein; Arne J Venjakob; Tim Saier; Marcus Schmitt-Sody; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.175

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.