BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic malignancy is quite well established. The aim of this study is to describe a single-centre's experience. METHODOLOGY: Data were collected retrospectively on all patients with solid pancreatic masses undergoing EUS-FNA from January 2006 to March 2011. In tumor cases, TNM staging using EUS was compared with the results of histopathological staging. RESULTS: EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions was performed in 125 patients. Of these patients, data of 75 were available (69% men, mean age 59.97±11.12 (SD) years); 58 (76%) of the lesions were ductal adenocarcinoma, 11 (14.5%) were chronic pancreatitis, 4 (%5) were intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMN) and 2 (%3) were insulinoma. Diagnostic yield of the EUS-FNA procedure was 74.7% (56/75). Specimens from six patients were inadequate. In multivariate analysis, lesion diameter below 2cm was an independent predictor for the inadequacy of material (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pancreatic mass with suspected malignancy, EUS-FNA provided a diagnosis with accuracy rate of 75%. Inadequate material with EUS-FNA was significantly more frequent in lesions below 2cm.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic malignancy is quite well established. The aim of this study is to describe a single-centre's experience. METHODOLOGY: Data were collected retrospectively on all patients with solid pancreatic masses undergoing EUS-FNA from January 2006 to March 2011. In tumor cases, TNM staging using EUS was compared with the results of histopathological staging. RESULTS: EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions was performed in 125 patients. Of these patients, data of 75 were available (69% men, mean age 59.97±11.12 (SD) years); 58 (76%) of the lesions were ductal adenocarcinoma, 11 (14.5%) were chronic pancreatitis, 4 (%5) were intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMN) and 2 (%3) were insulinoma. Diagnostic yield of the EUS-FNA procedure was 74.7% (56/75). Specimens from six patients were inadequate. In multivariate analysis, lesion diameter below 2cm was an independent predictor for the inadequacy of material (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pancreatic mass with suspected malignancy, EUS-FNA provided a diagnosis with accuracy rate of 75%. Inadequate material with EUS-FNA was significantly more frequent in lesions below 2cm.
Authors: H M Gordon; D A J Lloyd; A Higginson; R McCrudden; C Bent; F W Shek; R Beable; A Al-Badri; B Green; E Jaynes; B Foria; B S F Stacey Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-09
Authors: Peter Herbert Kann; Roland Moll; Detlef Bartsch; Andreas Pfützner; Thomas Forst; Gianluca Tamagno; Joachim N Goebel; Verena Fourkiotis; Simona Raluca Bergmann; Maike Collienne Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17