Literature DB >> 23320776

Social inequality in cancer rehabilitation: a population-based cohort study.

Lise Vilstrup Holm1, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Pia Veldt Larsen, Christoffer Johansen, Peter Vedsted, Stinne Holm Bergholdt, Jakob Kragstrup, Jens Søndergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a healthcare system with equal access we analysed possible associations between cancer survivors' socioeconomic status (SES) and their: 1) need for rehabilitation; 2) participation in rehabilitation activities; and 3) unmet needs for rehabilitation in a 14-month period following date of diagnosis.
METHODS: A population-based cohort study including incident cancer patients diagnosed from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008 in Denmark. Fourteen months after diagnosis participants completed a mailed out questionnaire developed to measure different aspects and dimensions of rehabilitation. Individual information on cohabitation status, education, income and labour market status was retrieved from national registers. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore associations between socioeconomic status and rehabilitation outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 3439 patients responded (70%). Significant interactions between SES and sex were demonstrated and further analyses were therefore stratified for gender. In general, women and to a lesser extent men with short education and low income participated less often in activities and had in some areas more unmet needs. Women living alone more often expressed a rehabilitation need in the physical, emotional and financial area and had to a higher extent unmet needs in a number of areas. Men living alone and men outside the workforce had increased odds of unmet needs in the physical area.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite equal access to care, SES had a significant impact on cancer survivors' rehabilitation. In general, the associations were most pronounced for female cancer patients. We suggest that special attention should be paid to socioeconomically disadvantaged groups by taking into account differences in SES in a clinical setting and when developing targeted rehabilitation programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23320776     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.745014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  22 in total

Review 1.  Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours.

Authors:  Christina Sinding; Rachel Warren; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Jonathan Sussman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Inequalities and Barriers to the Use of Supportive Care Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Understanding.

Authors:  Veronique Regnier Denois; Madina Querre; Linjie Chen; Marion Barrault; Franck Chauvin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  How Do We Follow Up Patients With Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen; Ole Mogensen; Dorte G Hansen; Stinne H Bergholdt; Pernille T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Mackenzi Pergolotti; Allison M Deal; Jessica Lavery; Bryce B Reeve; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes and Socioeconomic Status as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Study from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0902 Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knight; Karen L Syrjala; Navneet S Majhail; Michael Martens; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Brent R Logan; Stephanie J Lee; Paul B Jacobsen; William A Wood; Heather S L Jim; John R Wingard; Mary M Horowitz; Muneer H Abidi; Mingwei Fei; Laura Rawls; J Douglas Rizzo
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Influence of comorbidity on cancer patients' rehabilitation needs, participation in rehabilitation activities and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jakob Kragstrup; Christoffer Johansen; Rene dePont Christensen; Peter Vedsted; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Cancer stage, comorbidity, and socioeconomic differences in the effect of cancer on labour market participation: a danish register-based follow-up study.

Authors:  Karsten Thielen; Christophe Kolodziejczyk; Ingelise Andersen; Eskil Heinesen; Finn Diderichsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Readiness for cancer rehabilitation in Denmark: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maria Kristiansen; Lis Adamsen; Carsten Hendriksen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Identifying functional impairment and rehabilitation needs in patients newly diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer: a structured literature review.

Authors:  Joanne Louise Bayly; Mari Lloyd-Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.359

10.  The effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation: RePCa-a randomised study among primary prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  K B Dieperink; C Johansen; S Hansen; L Wagner; K K Andersen; L R Minet; O Hansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.