Literature DB >> 23320569

Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis.

Ataís Bacchi1, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani, Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes Dos Santos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of framework material and vertical misfit on stress created in an implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The posterior part of a severely reabsorbed jaw with a fixed partial prosthesis above two osseointegrated titanium implants at the place of the second premolar and second molar was modeled using SolidWorks 2010 software. Finite element models were obtained by importing the solid model into an ANSYS Workbench 11 simulation. The models were divided into 15 groups according to their prosthetic framework material (type IV gold alloy, silver-palladium alloy, commercially pure titanium, cobalt-chromium alloy or zirconia) and vertical misfit level (10 µm, 50 µm and 100 µm). After settlement of the prosthesis with the closure of the misfit, simultaneous loads of 110 N vertical and 15 N horizontal were applied on the occlusal and lingual faces of each tooth, respectively. The data was evaluated using Maximum Principal Stress (framework, porcelain veneer and bone tissue) and a von Mises Stress (retention screw) provided by the software.
RESULTS: As a result, stiffer frameworks presented higher stress concentrations; however, these frameworks led to lower stresses in the porcelain veneer, the retention screw (faced to 10 µm and 50 µm of the misfit) and the peri-implant bone tissues.
CONCLUSION: The increase in the vertical misfit resulted in stress values increasing in all of the prosthetic structures and peri-implant bone tissues. The framework material and vertical misfit level presented a relevant influence on the stresses for all of the structures evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23320569     DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.757644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  10 in total

1.  Effect of vertical misfit and clip material on stress distribution of overdentures under masticatory loading.

Authors:  Mateus Bertolini Fernandes Dos Santos; Bruno Massucato Zen; Atais Bacchi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Stresses induced by one piece and two piece dental implants in All-on-4® implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: non linear finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostafa Abdelfattah Mohamed; Mohamed Gamal Askar; Mahmoud El-Moutassim Bellah El Homossany
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Flexural strengths of implant-supported zirconia based bridges in posterior regions.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Soufia Shafiei; Farzaneh Nourbakhshian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Fracture Strength of Three-Unit Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures with Excessive Crown Height Fabricated from Different Materials.

Authors:  Vahideh Nazari; Safoura Ghodsi; Marzieh Alikhasi; Majid Sahebi; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

5.  Morse taper performance: A finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Gustavo Passarelli Petris; João Paulo De Carli; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Pâmela Letícia Santos; Paula Benetti; Marcio Walber; Eduardo Sandini Linden; Maria Salete Sandini Linden
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study.

Authors:  Mikel Iturrate; Erlantz Lizundia; Xabier Amezua; Eneko Solaberrieta
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Bowen Ma; Xinxin Yue; Yujie Sun; Lingyan Peng; Wei Geng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Fixture-Level Implant Impression Making with Different Splinting Techniques.

Authors:  Mehrdad Nateghi; Ramin Negahdari; Sahar Molaei; Ali Barzegar; Sepideh Bohlouli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-10-14

9.  Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported 3Y-TZP-Zirconia Cantilevers: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mariana Novais; António Sérgio Silva; Joana Mendes; Pedro Barreiros; Carlos Aroso; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.748

10.  Fit of cobalt-chromium implant frameworks before and after ceramic veneering in comparison with CNC-milled titanium frameworks.

Authors:  Per Svanborg; Victoria Stenport; Alf Eliasson
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2015-10-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.