BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is most commonly performed utilizing a single-shot echo-planar imaging technique (ss-EPI). Susceptibility artifact and image blur are severe when this sequence is utilized at 3 T. PURPOSE: To evaluate a readout-segmented approach to DWI MR in comparison with single-shot echo planar imaging for brain MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 14 patients with acute and early subacute infarctions underwent DWI MR examinations at 1.5 and 3T with ss-EPI and readout-segmented echo-planar (rs-EPI) DWI at equal nominal spatial resolutions. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations were made, and two blinded readers ranked the scans in terms of high signal intensity bulk susceptibility artifact, spatial distortions, image blur, overall preference, and motion artifact. RESULTS: SNR and CNR were greatest with rs-EPI (8.1 ± 0.2 SNR vs. 6.0 ± 0.2; P <10(-4) at 3T). Spatial distortions were greater with single-shot (0.23 ± 0.03 at 3T; P <0.001) than with rs-EPI (0.12 ± 0.02 at 3T). Combined with blur and artifact reduction, this resulted in a qualitative preference for the readout-segmented scans overall. CONCLUSION: Substantial image quality improvements are possible with readout-segmented vs. single-shot EPI - the current clinical standard for DWI - regardless of field strength (1.5 or 3 T). This results in improved image quality secondary to greater real spatial resolution and reduced artifacts from susceptibility in MR imaging of the brain.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is most commonly performed utilizing a single-shot echo-planar imaging technique (ss-EPI). Susceptibility artifact and image blur are severe when this sequence is utilized at 3 T. PURPOSE: To evaluate a readout-segmented approach to DWI MR in comparison with single-shot echo planar imaging for brain MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 14 patients with acute and early subacute infarctions underwent DWI MR examinations at 1.5 and 3T with ss-EPI and readout-segmented echo-planar (rs-EPI) DWI at equal nominal spatial resolutions. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations were made, and two blinded readers ranked the scans in terms of high signal intensity bulk susceptibility artifact, spatial distortions, image blur, overall preference, and motion artifact. RESULTS: SNR and CNR were greatest with rs-EPI (8.1 ± 0.2 SNR vs. 6.0 ± 0.2; P <10(-4) at 3T). Spatial distortions were greater with single-shot (0.23 ± 0.03 at 3T; P <0.001) than with rs-EPI (0.12 ± 0.02 at 3T). Combined with blur and artifact reduction, this resulted in a qualitative preference for the readout-segmented scans overall. CONCLUSION: Substantial image quality improvements are possible with readout-segmented vs. single-shot EPI - the current clinical standard for DWI - regardless of field strength (1.5 or 3 T). This results in improved image quality secondary to greater real spatial resolution and reduced artifacts from susceptibility in MR imaging of the brain.
Authors: Martin Ott; Martin Blaimer; David M Grodzki; Felix A Breuer; Julie Roesch; Arnd Dörfler; Björn Heismann; Peter M Jakob Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: James Rafferty; Lance Farr; Tim James; David Chase; John Heinrich; Michael Brady Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Lawrence P Panych; Janice Fairhurst; Elmira Hassanzadeh; Ravi T Seethamraju; Clare M Tempany; Stephan E Maier Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Philipp Riffel; Henrik J Michaely; John N Morelli; Josef Pfeuffer; Ulrike I Attenberger; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Haneder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Philipp Riffel; Henrik J Michaely; John N Morelli; Josef Pfeuffer; Ulrike I Attenberger; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Haneder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yun Ju Kim; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Chang Suk Park; Hyeon Sook Kim; Yo Han Son; David Andrew Porter; Byung Joo Song Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.500