Literature DB >> 23319074

Prognostic value of tumor size in gastric cancer: an analysis of 2,379 patients.

Pengtao Guo1, Yangming Li, Zhi Zhu, Zhe Sun, Chong Lu, Zhenning Wang, Huimian Xu.   

Abstract

Tumor size has been included into the staging systems of many solid tumors, such as lung and breast. However, tumor size is not integrated in the staging of gastric cancer, and its prognostic value for gastric cancer needs to be reappraised. A total of 2,379 patients who received radical resection for histopathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the present study. Tumor size, originally presented as continuous variable, was categorized into small gastric cancer (SGC) group and large gastric cancer (LGC) group using an optimal cutoff point determined by Cox proportional hazards model. The associations between tumor size and other clinicopathological factors were checked using Chi-square test. Survival of gastric cancer patients was estimated by using univariate Kaplan-Meier method, and the survival difference was checked by using the log-rank test. The significant clinicopathological factors were included into the Cox proportional hazards model to determine the independent prognostic factors, and their hazard ratios were calculated. With the optimal cutoff point of 4 cm, tumor size was categorized into SGC group (≤ 4 cm) and LGC group (>4 cm). Tumor size closely correlated with age, tumor location, macroscopic type, Lauren classification, and lymphatic vessel invasion. Moreover, tumor size was also significantly associated with depth of tumor invasion and status of regional lymph nodes. The 5-year survival rate was 68.7 % for SGC group which was much higher than 40.2 % for LGC group. Univariate analysis showed that SGC had a better survival than LGC, mainly for patients with IIA, IIB, and IIIA stage. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size as well as age, tumor location, macroscopic type, Lauren classification, lymphatic vessel invasion, depth of tumor invasion, and status of regional lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer. Tumor size is a reliable prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer, and the measurement of tumor size would be helpful to the staging and management of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23319074     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0642-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  19 in total

1.  Maximum gastric cancer diameter as a prognostic indicator: univariate and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  A Giuliani; A Caporale; M Di Bari; M Demoro; P Gozzo; M Corona; M Miccini; T Ricciardulli; A Tocchi
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12

2.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Prognostic significance of host- and tumor-related factors in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Kouji Tanaka; Masaki Ohi; Takeshi Yokoe; Chikao Miki; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Macroscopic tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Tomohiro Osaki; Daiki Murakami; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Shotaro Oro; Shigeru Tatebe; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Pok Kim; Joo-Ho Lee; Soo-Jin Kim; Hang-Jong Yu; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in China.

Authors:  Ling Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Oshiro; M Mori; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prognostic factors of gastric cancer tumours of less than 2 cm in diameter: rationale for limited surgery.

Authors:  T Yokota; Y Kunii; T Saito; S Teshima; Y Yamada; K Iwamoto; H Takahashi; M Takahashi; S Kikuchi; H Yamauchi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Ulcer size as a novel indicator marker is correlated with prognosis of ulcerative gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Y Xu; J G Shen; J Y Shen; W J Chen; L B Wang
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  Prediction of lymph node metastasis by size of early gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Eigo Otsuji; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Toshiya Ochiai; Kazuma Okamoto; Hisakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of HER2 expression based on trastuzumab for gastric cancer (ToGA) criteria in gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianchun Gu; Leizhen Zheng; Yajie Wang; Meiling Zhu; Qin Wang; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-21

2.  Radiotherapy patterns of care in gastric adenocarcinoma: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Jessica Cheng; Malcolm H Squires; John L Mikell; Sarah B Fisher; Charles A Staley; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Walter J Curran; William A Hall; Lauren E Colbert; Joseph W Shelton; Shishir K Maithel; Jerome Landry; David S Yu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-06

3.  Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Rosa Berenato; Luca Turati; Alessia Mennitto; Francesca Steccanella; Marta Caporale; Pierpaolo Dallera; Filippo de Braud; Ezio Pezzica; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Giovanni Sgroi; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo Pietrantonio; Sandro Barni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Clinical significance of primary tumor score determined by tumor depth and size in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Naoto Haraguchi; Takaaki Arigami; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Shigehiro Yanagita; Yasuto Uchikado; Shinichiro Mori; Hiroshi Kurahara; Yuko Kijima; Akihiro Nakajo; Kosei Maemura; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  Is proximal gastrectomy indicated for locally advanced cancer in the upper third of the stomach?

Authors:  Motonari Ri; Koshi Kumagai; Ken Namikawa; Shinichiro Atsumi; Masaru Hayami; Rie Makuuchi; Satoshi Ida; Manabu Ohashi; Takeshi Sano; Souya Nunobe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-07-16

6.  The prognostic role of tumor size in stage T1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Yukun Jia; Zhan Peng; Guangye Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.253

7.  Prognostic Significance of Tumor Size in 2405 Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lin-Yong Zhao; Wei-Han Zhang; Xin-Zu Chen; Kun Yang; Xiao-Long Chen; Kai Liu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Does tumor size improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after surgical resection?

Authors:  Hongdian Zhang; Peng Tang; Xiaohui Miao; Yongyin Gao; Xiaobin Shang; Lei Gong; Zhao Ma; Mingjian Yang; Hongjing Jiang; Zhongli Zhan; Bin Meng; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

9.  Potential survival benefits of open over laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients beyond three years after surgery: result from multicenter in-depth analysis based on propensity matching.

Authors:  Ze-Ning Huang; YuBin Ma; Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.