Literature DB >> 23319040

Rifaximin as treatment for hepatic encephalopathy: some considerations.

Lorenzo Ridola, Angelo Zullo, Cesare Hassan.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23319040      PMCID: PMC3603492          DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.105930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1319-3767            Impact factor:   2.485


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Although hepatic encephalopathy (HE) pathogenesis is not completely clarified, plasma ammonia certainly remains the key factor.[1] Therefore, current therapeutic approaches for HE treatment and prevention are based upon ammonia lowering strategies. Ammonia mainly originates in the gut, being produced by glutamine metabolism in the small bowel and by bacterial flora in the large bowel.[1] Non-absorbable disaccharides therapy is among the most used treatment for HE.[1] We read with great interest the review by Bleibel W et al., recently published,[2] where therapy with rifaximin - a non-absorbable antibiotic is suggested to be superior as compared to non-absorbable disaccharides for HE treatment. However, there are no convincing data in literature clearly supporting the advantage of rifaximin over disaccharides. Indeed, in a systematic review, rifaximin has been found to be at least equally effective or superior to non-absorbable disaccharides and antimicrobials in relieving signs or symptoms observed in patients with mild to moderately severe HE.[3] However, as the authors pointed out, this review included studies with either open label or retrospective design, those with enrollement of patients with treatable precipitating factors, those with a lack of clearly described criteria for defining the efficacy of treatment, and studies not specifying the type of HE being evaluated.[3] Similarly, some methodological biases occurred in more recent studies on long-term rifaximin therapy in HE patients.[4] Moreover, rifaximin therapy failed to prevent HE in cirrhotics at high risk for its development, such as those with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).[5] The last but not the least, safety of long-term use of such an antibiotic in cirrhotics remains a matter for concern. Indeed, the increased rifaximin absorption in cirrhotics significantly raises its plasma concentrations in these patients with potential systemic side-effects.[4] Moreover, some cases of C. difficile colitis at long-term rifaximin therapy have been reported,[4] and the possibility of other bacterial resistance would suggest a note for caution for the proposed long-term rifaximin therapy in HE patients.[4]
  5 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Oliviero Riggio; Silvia Nardelli; Federica Moscucci; Chiara Pasquale; Lorenzo Ridola; Manuela Merli
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.126

2.  Pharmacological prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  O Riggio; A Masini; C Efrati; F Nicolao; S Angeloni; Filippo M Salvatori; M Bezzi; Adolfo F Attili; M Merli
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Rifaximin therapy and hepatic encephalopathy: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Lorenzo Ridola; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore Ma Campo; Oliviero Riggio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-06

Review 4.  Rifaximin for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Kenneth R Lawrence; Jacqueline A Klee
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 5.  Hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Wissam Bleibel; Abdullah M S Al-Osaimi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.