Literature DB >> 23318415

Evaluating the quality of pain management in a hospital setting: testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire.

Sigridur Zoëga1, Sandra Ward2, Sigridur Gunnarsdottir3.   

Abstract

Pain management is an important aspect of providing quality health care, and monitoring patient-related outcomes is a recommended quality improvement practice. Valid and reliable tools are needed for this purpose. The American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) is widely used to measure quality of pain management. The APS-POQ was recently revised to reflect advances in pain management. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the revised version in Icelandic patients in the hospital setting. The questionnaire was translated according to an adaptation of Brislin's model. Data were collected from 143 patients on 23 wards in a university hospital. Participants were ≥ 18 years old, hospitalized for >24 hours, alert, not too ill to participate, and in pain ≥ 1 on a 0-10 scale in the past 24 hours. Mean (SD) age was 66 (18) years, 51.4% were women, 48.6% men. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation confirmed a five-component structure, but four items lowered reliability and were removed from the scales. The final version consists of four components, with Cronbach α >.70, explaining 64.2% of the variance. Participants had little difficulty in answering the questionnaire, but two additional items about participation in decisions and pain medications were added in response to patients' comments and suggestions. Administering the Icelandic version of the APS-POQ-R was found to be feasible, and the questionnaire has acceptable construct validity and reliability. The results support the use of the APS-POQ-R-I to evaluate the quality of pain management in hospitals in Iceland.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23318415     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs        ISSN: 1524-9042            Impact factor:   1.929


  4 in total

1.  Pain after orthopaedic surgery: differences in patient reported outcomes in the United States vs internationally. An observational study from the PAIN OUT dataset.

Authors:  R Zaslansky; W Meissner; C R Chapman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients.

Authors:  Huan Fang; Jingjuan Liang; Zhen Hong; Kenji Sugiyama; Takao Nozaki; Susumu Kobayashi; Tetsuro Sameshima; Hiroki Namba; Tetsuya Asakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pain Management and Its Possible Implementation Research in North Ethiopia: A before and after Study.

Authors:  Mengistu Hagazi Tequare; James John Huntzicker; Hagos Gidey Mhretu; Yibrah Berhe Zelelew; Hiluf Ebuy Abraha; Mehari Abrha Tsegay; Kesatea Gebrewahd Gebretensaye; Daniel Gebre Tesfay; Julio Gonzalez Sotomayor; Rahel Nardos; Mary Beth Yosses; Joshua Edwin Cobbs; Jennifer Pui Ling Schmidt; Wendy Weisman; Leslie K Breitner
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2020-06-02

4.  Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Sook Hui Chaw; Yoke Lin Lo; Jia Yin Lee; Jia Wing Wong; Wan Aizat Wan Zakaria; Shairil Rahayu Ruslan; Wei Keang Tan; Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.