OBJECTIVES: To identify the correlates between risk perceptions and cervical cancer screening among urban Malaysian women. METHOD: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted among 231 women in Petaling Jaya city in 2007. The association of risk perceptions of cervical cancer and screening practice was analyzed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: 56% of the respondents ever had a Pap smear test. Knowledge of signs and symptoms (aPR=1.11, 95% CI=1.03-1.19), age (aPR=1.02, 95% CI=1.01-1.03), number of pregnancies (aPR=1.06, 95% CI=1.01-1.11), marital status, education level and religion were found to be significant correlates of Pap smear screening. Respondents who were never married were less likely to have had a Pap smear. Those who had no education or primary education were less likely to have had a Pap smear compared to those with degree qualification. The prevalence of screening was significantly higher among Christians and others (aPR=1.35; 95% CI=1.01-1.81) and Buddhists (aPR=1.38; 95% CI=1.03-1.84), compared to Muslims. CONCLUSION: Eliminating anecdotal beliefs as risks via targeted knowledge on established risk factors and culturally sensitive screening processes are strategic for increasing and sustaining uptake of Pap smear screening versus current opportunistic screening practices.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the correlates between risk perceptions and cervical cancer screening among urban Malaysian women. METHOD: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted among 231 women in Petaling Jaya city in 2007. The association of risk perceptions of cervical cancer and screening practice was analyzed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: 56% of the respondents ever had a Pap smear test. Knowledge of signs and symptoms (aPR=1.11, 95% CI=1.03-1.19), age (aPR=1.02, 95% CI=1.01-1.03), number of pregnancies (aPR=1.06, 95% CI=1.01-1.11), marital status, education level and religion were found to be significant correlates of Pap smear screening. Respondents who were never married were less likely to have had a Pap smear. Those who had no education or primary education were less likely to have had a Pap smear compared to those with degree qualification. The prevalence of screening was significantly higher among Christians and others (aPR=1.35; 95% CI=1.01-1.81) and Buddhists (aPR=1.38; 95% CI=1.03-1.84), compared to Muslims. CONCLUSION: Eliminating anecdotal beliefs as risks via targeted knowledge on established risk factors and culturally sensitive screening processes are strategic for increasing and sustaining uptake of Pap smear screening versus current opportunistic screening practices.
Authors: Catherine E Elmore; Emma McKim Mitchell; Katrina Debnam; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Kathryn Laughon; Kawai O Tanabe; Fern R Hauck Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Carmen W H Chan; Kai Chow Choi; Rosa S Wong; Ka Ming Chow; Winnie K W So; Doris Y P Leung; Wendy W T Lam; William Goggins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Aisha I El Habbash; Najihah Mohd Hashim; Mohamed Yousif Ibrahim; Maizatulakmal Yahayu; Fatima Abd Elmutaal Omer; Mashitoh Abd Rahman; Noraziah Nordin; Gwendoline Ee Cheng Lian Journal: PeerJ Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Brandon Chua; Viva Ma; Caitlin Asjes; Ashley Lim; Mahsa Mohseni; Hwee Lin Wee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 3.390