Literature DB >> 23318108

Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria.

Pierce D Nunley1, Ajay Jawahar, David A Cavanaugh, Charles R Gordon, Eubulus J Kerr, Phillip Andrew Utter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although several publications in the last decade have proved equality in safety and efficacy of the total disc replacement (TDR) to the anterior fusion procedure in cervical spine, the claim that TDR may reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has not been corroborated by clinical evidence.
PURPOSE: We attempt to predict the true incidence of symptomatic ASD after TDR surgery in the cervical spine at one or two levels at a median follow-up period of 4 years. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 763 patients were screened to participate in four different Food and Drug Administration device exemption trials for artificial cervical disc replacement at three collaborating institutions. Two hundred seventy-one patients qualified and enrolled in the trials. One hundred seventy-three randomized to receive artificial disc replacement surgery, and 167 have completed a 4-year or longer follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients experiencing cervical radiculopathy symptoms in the follow-up period were worked-up with clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, and other diagnostic studies. Once a clinical correlation was established with the imaging evidence of adjacent segment degeneration, a careful record was maintained to document the subsequent medical and/or surgical treatment received by these patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the true incidence of and factors affecting the ASD after cervical disc replacement in these patients.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15.2%) were identified to satisfy our criteria for ASD at the median follow-up of 51 months, with the annual incidence of 3.1% as calculated by life tables. The actuarial 5-year freedom from ASD rate was 71.6%±0.6%, and the mean period for freedom from ASD was 70.4±2.1 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic ASD after cervical TDR is 3.1% annually regardless of the patient's age, sex, smoking habits, and design of the TDR device. The presence of osteopenia and lumbar degenerative disease significantly increase the risk of developing ASD after anterior cervical surgery.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23318108     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  23 in total

Review 1.  Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Changgui Shi; Yifei Gu; Chengwei Yang; Rui Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical disc replacement - emerging equivalency to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Joseph F Baker; Ryan P Roach; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls.

Authors:  Dante Leven; Joshua Meaike; Kris Radcliff; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Authors:  Thomas P Loumeau; Bruce V Darden; Thomas J Kesman; Susan M Odum; Bryce A Van Doren; Eric B Laxer; Daniel B Murrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Correlation between cervical lordosis and adjacent segment pathology after anterior cervical spinal surgery.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun Jib Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 1: Radiographic Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 8.  Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Youdi Xue; Xi Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Franziska Heider; Christoph J Siepe; Bernhard Zillner; Ralph Kothe; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhao-Ming Zhong; Shi-Yuan Zhu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.