Literature DB >> 23317897

Quality control protocol for confocal systems.

Anda Cornea1.   

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of confocal imaging experiments require more stringent quality control of instrument function than qualitative imaging. Unfortunately, there are no standard procedures for quality control that are uniformly implemented, and, in multi user facilities experimenters rarely have access to the QC information. This paper proposes an easy and very efficient protocol that could be performed at the beginning of each day, experiment or even slide. It takes only a few minutes to assess laser stability, stage stability, channel registration in 3 dimensions and flatness of field. The information may be used either to calibrate data or, in more severe cases to request servicing the instrument.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23317897      PMCID: PMC4277795          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407239-8.00003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  4 in total

Review 1.  The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J Pawley
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Measuring and interpreting point spread functions to determine confocal microscope resolution and ensure quality control.

Authors:  Richard W Cole; Tushare Jinadasa; Claire M Brown
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide-based systems: instability.

Authors:  Robert M Zucker
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.

Authors:  R M Zucker; O Price
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2001-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.