BACKGROUND: Conventional therapeutic agents are largely unsatisfactory into the treatment of malignant melanoma. Recently, an innovative approach based on inhibitors of the mutated BRAF gene (which represents the most prevalent alteration in melanoma patients) appears very promising from the clinical point of view. On this regard, a new compound, dabrafenib (GSK2118436), has been demonstrated to be effective in patients carrying the BRAFV600E/K mutations. We here tested dabrafenib for its capability to inhibit cell growth on primary melanoma cell lines, established from patients' tumour tissues and carrying the BRAFV600D/R mutations. METHODS: Three melanoma cell lines were tested: M257 wild-type BRAF, LCP BRAFV600R and WM266 BRAFV600D. The MTT assays were performed using standardized approaches. To evaluate the inhibition of MAPK pathway and the consequent inhibition of cellular proliferation, the phosphorylation of ERK was examined by Western Blot analysis performed on total protein extracts from cell lines after treatment with dabrafenib. RESULTS: Our experiments demonstrated an effective action of Dabrafenib (GSK2118436) and the inhibition of MAPK pathway in melanoma cell lines carrying BRAFV600D/R mutations. CONCLUSION: These results could be helpful to enlarge the number of melanoma patients who may benefit of a more effective targeted treatment.
BACKGROUND: Conventional therapeutic agents are largely unsatisfactory into the treatment of malignant melanoma. Recently, an innovative approach based on inhibitors of the mutated BRAF gene (which represents the most prevalent alteration in melanomapatients) appears very promising from the clinical point of view. On this regard, a new compound, dabrafenib (GSK2118436), has been demonstrated to be effective in patients carrying the BRAFV600E/K mutations. We here tested dabrafenib for its capability to inhibit cell growth on primary melanoma cell lines, established from patients' tumour tissues and carrying the BRAFV600D/R mutations. METHODS: Three melanoma cell lines were tested: M257 wild-type BRAF, LCP BRAFV600R and WM266BRAFV600D. The MTT assays were performed using standardized approaches. To evaluate the inhibition of MAPK pathway and the consequent inhibition of cellular proliferation, the phosphorylation of ERK was examined by Western Blot analysis performed on total protein extracts from cell lines after treatment with dabrafenib. RESULTS: Our experiments demonstrated an effective action of Dabrafenib (GSK2118436) and the inhibition of MAPK pathway in melanoma cell lines carrying BRAFV600D/R mutations. CONCLUSION: These results could be helpful to enlarge the number of melanomapatients who may benefit of a more effective targeted treatment.
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a key regulator of cell cycle progression, commonly activated in humantumours through somatic oncogenic mutations in RAS, RAF, and MEK genes [1].In melanoma, the most commonly mutated component of the MAPK pathway is the BRAF gene; among others, the most prevalent BRAF mutation (nearly, 90% of cases) is represented by a substitution of valine with glutamic acid at position 600 (V600E) [2]. This amino acid change leads to oncogenic activation of BRAF, with an increase of its kinase activity, and subsequent induction of phosphorylation of the downstream ERK protein. Constitutively activated ERK then stimulates cell proliferation and survival, sustaining tumour maintenance and growth [2]. The remaining BRAF mutations are mostly represented by other V600 subtypes (V600K, V600D, and V600R), which account for about 8% of the pathogenetic gene sequence variants [3]. In our experience, mutations in BRAF gene occur in 43% of primary melanomas and 48% of metastatic melanomas [4].A significant benefit in melanoma treatment has been recently achieved with two selective inhibitors: vemurafenib (PLX4032), which seems to particularly act on BRAFV600E mutants (although it has been demonstrated to also inhibit proliferation of melanoma cell lines expressing other codon 600 BRAF mutations: V600D, V600K, and V600R) [5-7], and dabrafenib (GSK2118436), which has been demonstrated to mostly inhibit the kinase activity in BRAFV600E/K mutants [8,9].To investigate whether this latter compound may exert inhibiting effects on a wider range of BRAF mutants (similarly to those previously reported with vemurafenib/PLX4720 [5,7]), melanoma cell lines carrying the two remaining most prevalent BRAF mutations (V600D and V600R) were here treated with dabrafenib and cellular proliferation was then assessed.
Methods
To determine effects on proliferation, melanoma cell lines were treated in triplicate with increasing concentrations (3 to 100 nM) of dabrafenib for 72 hrs. To evaluate the occurrence of inhibitory effects on the ERK activation, a Western Blot analysis was performed on total proteins extracted from cell lines after the 72-hrs treatment with the BRAF inhibitor. In particular, the rate of phosphorylated ERK was estimated on equal amounts of total protein for cell lysates; GAPDH was used as an internal control for total protein expression levels. Cell doubling time was determined from cell numbers measured in duplicates every 24 hours for a period of 7 days, using Burker cell counts.
Results and discussion
Using a panel of melanoma cell lines derived from the establishment of excised primary and metastatic tumours, we have investigated the ability of dabrafenib to both exert an antiproliferative activity on cultured melanoma cells and block the ERK signalling induced by the mutated BRAF. In our assay, the LCP melanoma cell line carried the BRAFV600R mutation, whereas the WM266melanoma cell line presented the BRAFV600D variant (Figure 1A); the M257melanoma cell line, with a wild-type BRAF, was used as control.
Figure 1
Effects of dabrafenib in melanoma cell lines.A. BRAF mutational status in our series of melanoma cell lines. B. Antiproliferative activity of increasing concentrations of dabrafenib in each cell line, as compared with the untreated (0) control. C. Inhibitory effects of dabrafenib on ERK1-2 phosphorylation, under the same experimental conditions (drug concentrations and time of treatment) as above.
Effects of dabrafenib in melanoma cell lines.A. BRAF mutational status in our series of melanoma cell lines. B. Antiproliferative activity of increasing concentrations of dabrafenib in each cell line, as compared with the untreated (0) control. C. Inhibitory effects of dabrafenib on ERK1-2 phosphorylation, under the same experimental conditions (drug concentrations and time of treatment) as above.In our series, dabrafenib showed a remarkable inhibition of cell proliferation in both melanoma cell lines carrying a mutated BRAF (regardless of the type of mutation, BRAFV600D or BRAFV600R), with lack of significant antiproliferative effects in control cells presenting a wild-type BRAF (Figure 1B). Regarding the interference with the ERK signaling, cell lines with BRAFV600D/R mutations presented a faster and stronger inhibition of phosphorylated ERK as compared to control cells with a wild-type BRAF (Figure 1C).Dabrafenib has been reported to be specifically active on BRAFV600E/K mutants; data here presented strongly suggest that BRAFV600D/R mutations might be also included as an effective target of the drug. Nevertheless, although the BRAFV600D/R mutations constitute a small fraction of the entire set of oncogenic variants in BRAF gene, the availability of a drug showing effectiveness on a more inclusive variety of BRAF-mutated targets could be helpful from the practical point of view, allowing clinicians to enlarge the subset of melanomapatients who may benefit of a more effective targeted treatment.
Conclusions
Although carried out on a limited series of melanoma cell lines, our study provided evidence that dabrafenib may exert a wider inhibitory activity on oncogenic variants of BRAF.
Abbreviation
MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Competing interests
Dr Paolo A. Ascierto participated to Advisory Board from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche Genentech, GSK, and received honoraria from Brystol Myers Squibb, MSD and Roche-Genentech. All remaining authors declare the absence of any Competing Interest.
Authors’ contributions
GG performed data acquisition, data analysis, preparation of the illustration, and drafted the manuscript; GM contributed in data analysis and draft of the manuscript; NM contributed in interpretation of the data; AR critically revised the manuscript; AC contributed in data analysis; GP collaborated in the draft of the manuscript; PAA conceived and supervised the study, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/17/prepub
Authors: Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander M Menzies; Lauren E Haydu; Lydia Visintin; Matteo S Carlino; Julie R Howle; John F Thompson; Richard F Kefford; Richard A Scolyer; Georgina V Long Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gerald S Falchook; Georgina V Long; Razelle Kurzrock; Kevin B Kim; Tobias H Arkenau; Michael P Brown; Omid Hamid; Jeffrey R Infante; Michael Millward; Anna C Pavlick; Steven J O'Day; Samuel C Blackman; C Martin Curtis; Peter Lebowitz; Bo Ma; Daniele Ouellet; Richard F Kefford Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hong Yang; Brian Higgins; Kenneth Kolinsky; Kathryn Packman; Zenaida Go; Raman Iyer; Stanley Kolis; Sylvia Zhao; Richard Lee; Joseph F Grippo; Kathleen Schostack; Mary Ellen Simcox; David Heimbrook; Gideon Bollag; Fei Su Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Aaron M Udager; Jincheng Pan; Martin J Magers; Ganesh S Palapattu; Todd M Morgan; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Alon Z Weizer; Khaled S Hafez; David C Miller; James S Wolf; Jonathan B McHugh; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Cornelis Bisschop; Arja Ter Elst; Lisette J Bosman; Inge Platteel; Mathilde Jalving; Anke van den Berg; Arjan Diepstra; Bettien van Hemel; Gilles F H Diercks; Geke A P Hospers; Ed Schuuring Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Shaimaa A Gad; Hamdy E A Ali; Rofaida Gaballa; Rania M Abdelsalam; Mourad Zerfaoui; Hamed I Ali; Salwa H Salama; Sanaa A Kenawy; Emad Kandil; Zakaria Y Abd Elmageed Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: David Casadevall; Joana Vidal; Fernando Gallardo; Flavio Zuccarino; Montserrat Arumí-Uría; Alba Dalmases; Beatriz Bellosillo; Clara Montagut Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2016-06-02