Literature DB >> 23316977

Categorization of photographic images by rats using shape-based image dimensions.

Daniel I Brooks1, Ka H Ng, Eric W Buss, Andrew T Marshall, John H Freeman, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Strong interest exists in developing a rodent model of visual cognition to conduct research into the neural mechanisms of visual categorization. Yet, doubt remains as to whether rats perform visual categorization tasks as do humans and nonhuman primates. Here, we trained eight rats on two visual categorization tasks using photographs of eight objects from each of four basic-level categories: chairs, flowers, cars, and humans. In Experiment 1, rats learned to categorize chairs versus flowers; in Experiment 2, rats learned to categorize cars versus humans. After rats learned each discrimination, we tested them with eight novel pictures from each of the categories. The rats performed at reliably above-chance levels during these generalization tests. To determine which dimension(s) of the stimuli controlled the rats' behavior, we conducted regression analyses using several image dimensions. The chair versus flower discrimination was mainly controlled by the convexity of the stimuli, whereas the car versus human discrimination was mainly controlled by the aspect ratio of the stimuli. These results demonstrate that rats can categorize complex visual objects using shape-based properties of photographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23316977     DOI: 10.1037/a0030404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  13 in total

1.  Visual categorization of natural movies by rats.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Ben Vermaercke; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Anterior cingulate cortex inactivation impairs rodent visual selective attention and prospective memory.

Authors:  Jangjin Kim; Edward A Wasserman; Leyre Castro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Pigeons use high spatial frequencies when memorizing pictures.

Authors:  Matthew S Murphy; Daniel I Brooks; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Dorsal hippocampus is necessary for visual categorization in rats.

Authors:  Jangjin Kim; Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman; John H Freeman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Matching based on biological categories in Orangutans (Pongo abelii) and a Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Invariant visual object recognition and shape processing in rats.

Authors:  Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Object similarity affects the perceptual strategy underlying invariant visual object recognition in rats.

Authors:  Federica B Rosselli; Alireza Alemi; Alessio Ansuini; Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Neural Representations of Natural and Scrambled Movies Progressively Change from Rat Striate to Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Gert Van den Bergh; Ben Vermaercke; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.