Literature DB >> 23316912

The role of amino acid sequence in the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: insights from coarse-grained modeling.

Anuj Chaudhri1, Isidro E Zarraga, Sandeep Yadav, Thomas W Patapoff, Steven J Shire, Gregory A Voth.   

Abstract

Coarse-grained computational models of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and their mutants can be used to understand the effect of domain-level charge-charge electrostatics on the self-association phenomena at high protein concentrations. The coarse-grained models are constructed for two antibodies at different coarse-grained resolutions by using six different concentrations. It is observed that a particular monoclonal antibody (hereafter referred to as MAb1) forms three-dimensional heterogeneous structures with dense regions or clusters compared to a different monoclonal antibody (hereafter referred to as MAb2) that forms homogeneous structures without clusters. The potential of mean force (PMF) and radial distribution functions (RDF) plots for the mutants (hereafter referred to as M1, M5, M7, and M10) show trends consistent with previously reported experimental observation of viscosities. The mutant referred to as M6 shows strongly attractive interactions that are consistent with previously reported negative second virial coefficients (B(22)) obtained from light-scattering experiments (Yadav et al. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 1750-1764; Yadav et al. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2012, 9, 791-802). Clustering data on MAb1 reveal a small number of large clusters that are hypothesized to be the reason for the high experimental viscosity. This is in contrast with M6 (that differs from MAb1 in only a few amino acids), where cluster analysis reveals the formation of a large number of smaller clusters that is hypothesized to be the reason for the observed lower viscosity. The coarse-grained representations are effective in picking up differences based on local charge distributions of domains to make predictions on the self-association characteristics of these protein solutions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23316912     DOI: 10.1021/jp3108396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  19 in total

1.  Computational tool for the early screening of monoclonal antibodies for their viscosities.

Authors:  Neeraj J Agrawal; Bernhard Helk; Sandeep Kumar; Neil Mody; Hasige A Sathish; Hardeep S Samra; Patrick M Buck; Li Li; Bernhardt L Trout
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Molecular basis of high viscosity in concentrated antibody solutions: Strategies for high concentration drug product development.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Sandeep Kumar; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Li Li
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Trimer Self-Assembly Under Shear.

Authors:  Raymond D Mountain; Harold W Hatch; Vincent K Shen
Journal:  Fluid Phase Equilib       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.775

4.  Rational design of viscosity reducing mutants of a monoclonal antibody: hydrophobic versus electrostatic inter-molecular interactions.

Authors:  Pilarin Nichols; Li Li; Sandeep Kumar; Patrick M Buck; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Bryan Balthazor; Tami R Conley; David Sek; Martin J Allen
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Yingda Xu; Dongdong Wang; Bruce Mason; Tony Rossomando; Ning Li; Dingjiang Liu; Jason K Cheung; Wei Xu; Smita Raghava; Amit Katiyar; Christine Nowak; Tao Xiang; Diane D Dong; Joanne Sun; Alain Beck; Hongcheng Liu
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Contrasting the Influence of Cationic Amino Acids on the Viscosity and Stability of a Highly Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody.

Authors:  Barton J Dear; Jessica J Hung; Thomas M Truskett; Keith P Johnston
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  In Silico Prediction of Diffusion Interaction Parameter (kD), a Key Indicator of Antibody Solution Behaviors.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Satish K Singh; Li Li; Matthew P Broulidakis; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Concentration dependent viscosity of monoclonal antibody solutions: explaining experimental behavior in terms of molecular properties.

Authors:  Li Li; Sandeep Kumar; Patrick M Buck; Christopher Burns; Janelle Lavoie; Satish K Singh; Nicholas W Warne; Pilarin Nichols; Nicholas Luksha; Davin Boardman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Parallel temperature-dependent microrheological measurements in a microfluidic chip.

Authors:  Lilian Lam Josephson; William J Galush; Eric M Furst
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Charge-mediated Fab-Fc interactions in an IgG1 antibody induce reversible self-association, cluster formation, and elevated viscosity.

Authors:  Jayant Arora; Yue Hu; Reza Esfandiary; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; Sangeeta B Joshi; C Russell Middaugh; David B Volkin; David D Weis
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.