Literature DB >> 23316013

The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Wolfgang Sieghart1, Florian Hucke, Matthias Pinter, Ivo Graziadei, Wolfgang Vogel, Christian Müller, Harald Heinzl, Michael Trauner, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We aimed to establish an objective point score to guide the decision for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In all, 222 patients diagnosed with HCC and treated with multiple TACE cycles between January 1999 and December 2009 at the Departments of Gastroenterology/Hepatology of the Medical Universities of Vienna (training cohort) and Innsbruck (validation cohort) were included. We investigated the effect of the first TACE on parameters of liver function and tumor response and their impact on overall survival (OS, log rank test) and developed a point score (ART score: Assessment for Retreatment with TACE) in the training cohort (n = 107, Vienna) by using a stepwise Cox regression model. The ART score was externally validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 115, Innsbruck). The increase of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by >25% (hazard ratio [HR] 8.4; P < 0.001), an increase of Child-Pugh score of 1 (HR 2.0) or ≥2 points (HR 4.4) (P < 0.001) from baseline, and the absence of radiologic tumor response (HR 1.7; P = 0.026) remained independent negative prognostic factors for OS and were used to create the ART score. The ART score differentiated two groups (0-1.5 points; ≥2.5 points) with distinct prognosis (median OS: 23.7 versus 6.6 months; P < 0.001) and a higher ART score was associated with major adverse events after the second TACE (P = 0.011). These results were confirmed in the external validation cohort and remained significant irrespective of Child-Pugh stage and the presence of ascites prior the second TACE.
CONCLUSION: An ART score of ≥2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;57:2261-2273).
Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23316013     DOI: 10.1002/hep.26256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  108 in total

1.  Predictors of repeat transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jared A White; David T Redden; Mary Kate Bryant; David Dorn; Souheil Saddekni; Ahmed Kamel Abdel Aal; Jessica Zarzour; David Bolus; J Kevin Smith; Stephen Gray; Devin E Eckhoff; Derek A DuBay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Pharmacokinetic study of conventional sorafenib chemoembolization in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model.

Authors:  Ahmad Parvinian; Leigh C Casadaban; Zane Z Hauck; Richard B van Breemen; Ron C Gaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis: evaluating effectiveness of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score compared with the Child-Pugh classification.

Authors:  Eiichiro Okazaki; Akira Yamamoto; Norifumi Nishida; Masao Hamuro; Ryo Ogino; Masako Hosono; Yasuhiko Shimatani; Shinichi Tsutsumi; Shinichi Hamamoto; Etsuji Sohgawa; Atsushi Jogo; Yukio Miki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma review: current treatment, and evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Ali Raza; Gagan K Sood
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Recommendations for the use of chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Usefulness of scoring system?

Authors:  Xavier Adhoute; Guillaume Penaranda; Paul Castellani; Herve Perrier; Marc Bourliere
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 6.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Steps forward but still a long way to go.

Authors:  Liat Mlynarsky; Yoram Menachem; Oren Shibolet
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Effects of transarterial chemoembolization on regulatory T cell and its subpopulations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hana Park; Jae Hyung Jung; Min Kyung Jung; Eui-Cheol Shin; Simon Weonsang Ro; Jeon Han Park; Do Young Kim; Jun Yong Park; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 8.  Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Ann-Lii Cheng; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Jidong Jia; Ryosuke Tateishi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Yoghesh K Chawla; Shuichiro Shiina; Wasim Jafri; Diana Alcantara Payawal; Takamasa Ohki; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Pei-Jer Chen; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Laurentius A Lesmana; Rino A Gani; Shuntaro Obi; A Kadir Dokmeci; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.047

9.  ART and science in using transarterial chemoembolization for retreating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Evangelia M Fatourou; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 10.  Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Marine Gilabert; Jordi Bruix; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.