Literature DB >> 23315788

GAPSS: the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score.

Savino Sciascia1, Giovanni Sanna, Veronica Murru, Dario Roccatello, Munther A Khamashta, Maria Laura Bertolaccini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a risk score [global APS score (GAPSS)] derived from the combination of independent risk for thrombosis and pregnancy loss (PL), taking into account the aPL profile, conventional cardiovascular risk factors and the autoimmune antibody profile.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 211 consecutive SLE patients. Data on clinical manifestations, conventional cardiovascular risk factors, aPL profile, ANAs, ENA and anti-dsDNA were collected. Long-term low-dose aspirin, oral anticoagulant and HCQ treatment were also included in the analysis. Patients were randomly divided into two sets by a computer-generated randomized list. We developed GAPSS in the first set of patients (n = 106), assigning the risk factors identified by multivariate analysis weighted points proportional to the β-regression coefficient values. GAPSS was validated in the second set of patients (n = 105). The relationship between GAPPS and thrombosis and/or PL was analysed.
RESULTS: In the first set, higher values of GAPSS were seen in patients who experienced thrombosis and/or PL compared with those without clinical events [GAPSS 9.3 (4.8) (range 1-19) and 5.3 (4) (range 0-16), P < 0.001]. Also taken separately, patients who experienced thrombosis or PL showed higher GAPSS compared with those without clinical events [GAPSS 9.6 (4.8) (range 1-19) vs 4.9 (5) (range 0-14), P = 0.027 for thrombosis; 7.3 (5) vs 3.9 (5.1) (range 0-16), P = 0.024 for PL, respectively]. In the second set, the results were similar, with statistically higher values of GAPSS in patients with a clinical history of thrombosis and/or PL compared with those without events [GAPSS 9.5 (5.6) (range 0-20) and 3.9 (4.1) (range 0-17), P < 0.001). Higher values were also seen when subclassifying the patients according to the clinical manifestation, thrombosis or PL [GAPSS 9.5 (5.6) (range 0-20) vs 4.8 (5.4) (range 0-17), P = 0.036 for thrombosis; 7.9 (3.3) vs 3.8 (5.4) (range 0-16), P = 0.037 for PL, respectively).
CONCLUSION: These data propose a substantial improvement in risk prediction of thrombosis or PL in SLE based on assessment of the GAPSS, a quantitative scoring system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hughes syndrome; antiphospholipid antibodies; pregnancy loss; prothrombin; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315788     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  51 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Risk Assessment in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Current Landscape and Emerging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shruti Chaturvedi; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Top 10 clinical research developments in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Medha Barbhaiya; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Novel diagnostic and therapeutic frontiers in thrombotic anti-phospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Massimo Radin; Mario Bazzan; Dario Roccatello
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  The Laboratory Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Authors:  Jasmina Ahluwalia; Sreejesh Sreedharanunni
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Thrombotic risk factors in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a single center experience.

Authors:  Ghaith Abu-Zeinah; Clara Oromendia; Maria T DeSancho
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Elevated partial antiphospholipid score is a strong risk factor for thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a validation study.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Shuhui Sun; Qingran Yan; Chunde Bao; Qiong Fu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) and the risk of recurrent thrombosis: Results from the APS ACTION cohort.

Authors:  Massimo Radin; Savino Sciascia; Doruk Erkan; Vittorio Pengo; Maria G Tektonidou; Amaia Ugarte; Pierluigi Meroni; Lanlan Ji; H Michael Belmont; Hannah Cohen; Guilherme Ramires de Jesús; D Ware Branch; Paul R Fortin; Laura Andreoli; Michelle Petri; Esther Rodriguez; Ignasi Rodriguez-Pinto; Jason S Knight; Tatsuya Atsumi; Rohan Willis; Emilio Gonzalez; Rosario Lopez-Pedrera; Ana Paula Rossi Gandara; Margarete Borges Gualhardo Vendramini; Alessandra Banzato; Ecem Sevim; Medha Barbhaiya; Maria Efthymiou; Ian Mackie; Maria Laura Bertolaccini; Danieli Andrade
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Comparative analysis of different enzyme immunoassays for assessment of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies.

Authors:  Olga Amengual; Tetsuya Horita; Walter Binder; Gary L Norman; Zakera Shums; Masaru Kato; Kotaro Otomo; Yuichiro Fujieda; Kenji Oku; Toshiyuki Bohgaki; Shinsuke Yasuda; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Management of recurrent thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Cecilia Nalli; Laura Andreoli; Cinzia Casu; Angela Tincani
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Duration of anticoagulation treatment for thrombosis in APS: is it ever safe to stop?

Authors:  Sinthiya Punnialingam; Munther A Khamashta
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.